UAP Gerb Knowledge Base
People

Daniel Sheehan

Daniel Sheehan is a prominent constitutional attorney and activist known for his involvement in high-profile cases and his role as general counsel for UAP whistleblower Luis Elizondo. In 1977, under orders from President Jimmy Carter, Sheehan was tasked with reviewing classified portions of Project Blue Book at the Library of Congress, during which he claims to have discovered five or six photographs of a crashed saucer-shaped UAP in snowy terrain featuring distinctive symbols around the base of the craft's dome — symbols that Green Beret witness RA independently identified in 2023 as matching the hieroglyphic-like characters projected by recovered technology at the Off-World Technologies Division.

RoleConstitutional attorney; general counsel for Luis Elizondo and Lue Elizondo

Daniel Sheehan has built a career around constitutional law, civil rights, and high-profile national security cases. His legal work has intersected with government secrecy, national security operations, and whistleblower protection — making him a natural fit as counsel for UAP disclosure figures.

1977 Project Blue Book Review Under Carter

Presidential Assignment

In 1977, attorney Daniel Sheehan claimed that he was assigned under orders from President Jimmy Carter — who had a documented personal interest in UAP and had filed his own UFO sighting report — to scour classified portions of Project Blue Book files housed at the Library of Congress.

President Carter's interest in UAP is on record: he campaigned on a promise to release UFO information and had a well-documented sighting of his own. The assignment to Sheehan fits Carter's known attempts to access classified UAP information during his presidency.

Discovery of Classified Photographs

Among the classified materials, Sheehan claims to have found a series of five or six photographs depicting a downed saucer-shaped UAP:

Physical Scene:

  • Crashed in a snowy field
  • Plowed through the terrain creating a visible ditch
  • Stuck in the side of an embankment
  • U.S. Air Force personnel visible in the photographs, identifiable by their fur-hooded jackets appropriate for cold weather
  • Personnel appeared "really excited" based on their body language while photographing the craft

Craft Description:

  • Saucer-shaped with a semicircular dome structure
  • Symbols running along the base of the dome, all the way around the bottom perimeter

The Symbols

Sheehan provided specific details about the iconography on the craft:

Symbol Characteristics:

  • "Straight lines with dashes and dots and little horseshoe shapes"
  • Arranged in sequence around the base of the craft's dome
  • Distinctly different from Roswell symbols: Sheehan explicitly stated "it didn't look like the ones at Roswell. These are different."
  • Sheehan could not recall the exact sequence but remembered the shapes precisely

Sheehan's description: "Here's the semicircle of the craft like this and the edges here, and they were a series of these straight lines with dashes and dots and little horseshoe shapes like this. And they went all the way around the bottom. But that's exactly what they looked like. And it didn't look like the ones at Roswell. These are different."

RA's Independent Corroboration (2023)

When Green Beret RA was shown various examples of alleged UAP iconography during his interviews with UAP Gerb — including the famous Roswell I-Beam symbols — he identified no matches until shown a recreation of the symbols Sheehan had described.

RA's reaction:

  • The symbols Sheehan drew "look quite close to the symbols projected from this anomalous technology"
  • These were the symbols RA saw projected (without visible projection mechanism) from the gauntlet-like device at the Off-World Technologies Division
  • The match was identified blind — RA was not told whose description he was viewing

This independent corroboration across 46 years (1977 → 2023) and between two unconnected witnesses represents significant evidential convergence.

Possible Source Incident: 1952 Spitsbergen, Norway

Timeline Analysis

Project Blue Book ran from 1952 to 1969. Since Sheehan reviewed photographs from classified sections of Blue Book, and the images showed:

  • U.S. Air Force personnel
  • Snow and cold-weather gear
  • Excitement suggesting an active recovery operation

UAP researchers have attempted to identify the specific incident. One candidate is the 1952 Spitsbergen, Norway event:

  • Reported crash of a 47-meter disc in Norway
  • CIA took documented interest in the case
  • Timeline fits the classified Blue Book period
  • Geographic location matches snowy terrain
  • However, confusion exists around this case with possible disinformation pathways

Besides the Norway case, few documented UAP incidents from the Blue Book era match all conditions (snow, USAF involvement, saucer shape, classified status). This suggests the photographed incident may have been a retrieval operation kept entirely under wraps, never entering public UFO case databases.

Connection to Radiance Technologies and Hypersonics

In 2023, during appearances at UFO conferences, Sheehan made additional claims connecting defense contractor Radiance Technologies to UAP reverse engineering:

  • Alleged that Radiance's Prompt Global Strike hypersonic missile program leveraged reverse-engineered UAP technologies
  • This claim is notable given that both SAIC and Sandia National Laboratories — both historically implicated in UAP programs — are connected to Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane's hypersonics programs
  • Suggests a potential technology transfer pipeline from crash retrieval → analysis at facilities like Crane → integration into advanced weapons programs

Role as Luis Elizondo's Attorney

Sheehan serves as general counsel for former AATIP director Luis Elizondo, providing legal protection and representation for Elizondo's public UAP disclosure efforts. This role has positioned Sheehan to:

  • Assist with navigating security clearances and non-disclosure obligations
  • Facilitate whistleblower protections
  • Provide legal counsel on public disclosure strategy

Significance in UAP Research

Daniel Sheehan's testimony is significant for several reasons:

  1. Presidential authentication: Assignment from Carter provides high-level government connection
  2. Independent corroboration: RA's 2023 identification of matching symbols represents blind corroboration 46 years apart
  3. Distinct from Roswell: Establishes multiple crash retrievals with different symbol sets, suggesting multiple non-human sources or craft types
  4. Photographic evidence existed: The classified Blue Book photographs represent physical documentation that may still exist in government archives
  5. Geographic expansion: If the Spitsbergen Norway connection is accurate, extends confirmed U.S. recovery operations to international incidents

Unanswered Questions

  • Are the classified Project Blue Book photographs Sheehan viewed still accessible in government archives?
  • What specific incident do the photographs document?
  • Are there additional photograph sets in classified Blue Book materials?
  • Why were these particular photographs classified when Blue Book was ostensibly a public-facing program?
  • Has anyone else viewed these photographs and can corroborate Sheehan's description?

Sources

Linked entries

Luis ElizondoProject Blue BookRAOff-World Technologies DivisionSAICSandia National LaboratoriesNaval Surface Warfare Center CraneOff-World Technologies Division – UAP Technology Reverse EngineeringSpitsbergen, Norway

Backlinks

Off-World Technologies DivisionRA's Weapons Training Course at NSWC CraneCrane, IndianaNaval Surface Warfare Center Crane, IndianaUnderground Facility at NSWC CranePeople MOCNaval Surface Warfare Center CraneSAICRAOff-World Technologies Division – UAP Technology Reverse EngineeringUS Navy UFO Crash Retrieval & Reverse Engineering Programs