Transcript - The Hidden Wing - US Air Force UFO Reverse Engineering Programs

The earth is 70% water and 30% land. But the entire sky belongs to us. Heat. Heat. Copy that. >> The expressed purpose of my channel is to investigate and unveil UFO legacy program operations, special access, unacknowledged special access, and controlled access programs. recessed to the darkest corners of the US industrial base and black budget carved out of traditional oversight channels that performs full spectrum recovery, storage, exploitation, derivation, and program protection of UFOs and technologies of unknown origin. Since the 2023 testimony of David Grush, what once appeared to me as a tangled web of nebulous programs and names existing under the ever infamous claims and testimony of quote unquote UFO crash retrievals and quote unquote UFO reverse engineering have begun to form a crystal clear and quite tangible picture. After all, if these programs do indeed exist as a shadow within the Department of Defense and Intelligence community, which I vehemently believe they do, a footprint of involved agencies, directorates, offices, infrastructure, program protection institutions, etc. that actually possess the budget, resources, and statutory and regulatory authority to engage in various aspects of UFO legacy programs should be traceable with enough analysis. And while the structure of such UFO legacy programs is likely more complicated and complex than a channel like mine will ever fully decipher, my first and only goal is to uncover these programs that are tasked with collection to derivation of nonhuman technologies that have existed since at least 1947. My pursuit of exposing UFO legacy program operations has led me to discuss myriad involved Department of Defense and intelligence community agencies as well as offices, directorates, defense industrialbased infrastructure, federally funded research and development centers, program protection strategies, defense contractors, major range and test facility bases, US executive branch compartments, creative classification systems under of the Department of Energy, direct action crash retrieval tier 1 units, security mechanisms, senior flag officers, general officers, and senior executive service, etc., etc., etc., that comprise countless siloed UFO legacy programs. Recently, I discussed a conceptual outward view of UFO programs and visualize this organizational chart as a pyramid that I strongly believe takes all of the aspects I just spoke of above and offers an accurate assessment of the structure of such technology of unknown origin or TUO programs. And let us quickly recap my theorized pyramid. At the top of this pyramid sits the UFO control group. the lucky few who possess what we might call a consensus understanding of UFOs and UFO legacy programs. Individuals who can access programs siloed from one another within the US Department of Defense and Intelligence communities. I wager such individuals may include secretive scientific think tanks run out of the MITER Corporation like the Jason Advisory Panel and even powerful figures above them that shared ties to the US executive branch like the late former Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney. Beneath the Dick Cheney, Jason's and quote unquote UFO control group, I believe, sits UFO Legacy Program administrators, offices and agencies tasked with specific TUO operations hidden within SAPS, USPS, and CAPS. Such admins likely include directorates and elements of the big six intelligence agencies. the NRO, specifically NRO acquisitions, NGA, NEURO, the DIA, CIA, and their infamous Directorate of Science and Technology and the NSA headquarters, Directorates, major commands, aka MAGCOMs, and elements within the US Navy, Air Force, and Army, as well as compartments of the US National Security Council within the executive branch, such as the under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustain ainment under the secretary of defense and deputy director of national intelligence for acquisition technology and facilities under the office of the director of national intelligence. Indeed, I strongly theorize that even at an admin level, UFO legacy programs are highly compartmentalized and siloed from one another. Sure, I do understand there are numerous programs with extensive crossover such as UFO crash retrieval teams operated with ISR or intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance support from the NRO, NEURO and NGA. Logistics support from the CIA DS&T as well as Office of Global Access. transport from the US Army 160th Soore aka the Nightstalkers and direct action from parallel tier 1 J-C units. And I outlined all of this in my video on the NRO. But I also believe with conviction, might I add that much clandestine UFO storage, exploitation, and derivation operations, which can all be categorized under RD& or research, development, test, and evaluation within an admin level, is compartmentalized, and as I said before, siloed. For example, programs within US Army and US Air Force in the early 21st century likely both attempted to adapt electrooptic cloaking systems from downed NHI craft to use on US air and ground platforms, but with little to no cooperation, communication, or consolidation with the opposing branch of the US armed forces. Below the administration level in my program framework is where I differ greatly from many prominent figures in the UFO field. I strongly disagree with Hal Putoff for example who states that UFO legacy programs are relegated to defense industrial-based prime contractors such as Loheed Martin or Northrup Grumman to protect the programs from the Freedom of Information Act. As we look at the actual structure of the interaction between the government and private industry in in this UAP area over the years it has uh morphed transitioned into it being largely under the aegis of the contractors. If you do something within the government eventually it can be accessed by freedom of information act but if you do something through contractors they're not available through freedom of information act. I vehemently believe that most, not all, but most, UFO legacy programs operate not without oversight as many like to claim, but instead parallel stripped oversight channels. In my view, such programs are run extremely strictly to maximize efficiency while minimizing readin personnel, ensuring flawless program security and protection while keeping technological breakthroughs inhouse. It is for this exact reason that I believe that FFRDC's or federally funded research and development centers are the next step down in legacy program structure. These go-kos are governmentowned contractor operated institutions such as the MITER Corporation, Aerospace Corporation, Rand Corporation, and DOE/NnSA National Labs such as Sandia, Los Alamos, and Oak Ridge operate as subject matter experts and R&D program aces within the legacy programs, serving the long-term and specialized science and technology needs required by their program sponsors. that could not accomplish these in house. I hypothesize FFRDC's are a useful tool harnessed by the pyramid to act as the arbiter of information to the lowest level and least secure level of the pyramid. Defense industrial-based contractors such as Loheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Rathon, SIC, etc. Indeed, I have gone on record before to state I strongly wager most individuals within defense contractors engaged with UFO programs don't even know what they're working on. In my opinion, it is specifically SAP security specialists and corporate directors for special programs within contractors that actually possess prior knowledge of TO programs. And this will become very pertinent to today. And finally, the material that comprises the pyramid and mortar that binds together this legacy program structure of mine. Well, this would be the defense industrial base whose authoritative channels are often bypassed to allow UFO legacy programs to harness any US military and intelligence assets needed to accomplish these clandestine mission directives and the limestone casing to protect the pyramid from the elements and exposure. SAPS, CAPS, USAPS, carveout contracts, program protection offices like the DARPA security and intelligence directorate, Air Force Office of Special Investigation, Department of Energy, Office of Intelligence and Counter Intelligence, Counter Intelligence, Shan Kirkpatre, etc. Now, I know this is already a lot for an introduction, and we have not even discussed the topic of today's video. All of this is to illustrate that legacy program structure is not as simple as a nebulous and untraceable group of compartments within the USG military and intelligence community. Additionally, I outline a plethora of critical components that comprise UFO legacy programs here because I am at odds with what I consider an egregious falsity outlined in the Age of Disclosure documentary. >> What else you want to know? Within the dock, Louisa Lzando and Eric Davis outlines the quote unquote legacy program, singular and monolithic. This legacy program apparently contains the CIA DS&T at the top with DS&T deputy director incomplete charge over the crash retrieval portfolio with the Department of Energy, Defense Contractors, and Air Force all on an equal level below the agency. This to me is a catastrophic oversimplification and terrible omission of involvement. While I agree that all four institutions outlined by the documentary are absolutely involved in legacy programs, I do believe this outline was constructed by figures delegating who gets to catch the live hand grenade. Recently, I investigated the National Reconnaissance Offic's involvement in UFO legacy programs and spent a significant amount of time analyzing where I believe many of the NRO's legacy programs are held. This being NRO acquisitions alongside the DoD/IC elements that control NRO acquisitions as well as investigating alleged gatekeepers and high-level legacy personnel within the NRO. Since the NRO was ultimately formed to consolidate reconnaissance activities between the US Air Force and CIA and the NRO's role within the programs was grossly oversimplified and misrepresented within the age of disclosure. I think it is only fair we now shift our sights to the greatest air power in the world, the US Air Force. >> The future waits for no one. So we refuse to wait for it. We're not just pilots and engineers. We are pioneers. Today battles are waged in nanconds and planes are piloted from the other side of the world. We turn night into day and fly missions in space. The future's not coming. It's already here. This is the future. Join us and be the future. The Air Force is integrally entwined with the subject of unidentified flying objects. From decades of aerial sightings by military pilots to endless claims, the air enforcement branch of the US armed forces engages with UFO crash retrieval and reverse engineering. And it is for this reason this investigation will be very different from my regular projects. This project will not seek to tread over already established paths. While we will summarize key milestones and public claims surrounding the Air Force and UFO legacy program operations, the goal of this video is to analyze with extreme scrutiny and prejudice the modern-day 21st century Air Force UFO legacy programs. Yes, today's investigation will seek to unmask and outline the current modern-day legacy program structure within the Air Force. This investigation is so robust and complex that I will do another thing that I have never done before. And this is to conduct an executive summary listing all of my findings before our thorough investigation. And last thing before we get into this, I know I use a lot of acronyms. This video will be no exception as we will be actively exploring compartments within the US Air Force. So please guys bear with me here. I will do my best to list acronyms, challenging concepts, and visual representations for Air Force compartments on screen. Although complex with endless names, places, and acronyms to track, and at times hard to rationalize, I do firmly believe this project may be my most important work to date. With all that out of the way, let us seek to investigate three simple questions. Does the Air Force engage in UFO recovery, storage, exploitation, and derivation programs? And if so, how are these programs structured today? And what critical people are involved? This investigation will lead us down winding paths, curious compartments to hidden figures and astonishing capabilities within the Air Force. Due to the complexity and amount of information in this project, perhaps it is imperative to detail an executive summary and present my findings before diving into the research and evidence. With that being said, this project began as a top-down overview of the Air Force's organizational chart that encompasses the entire Air Force organization called the DAFF or the Department of the Air Force to accurately identify major Air Force compartments engaged with UFO retrievalss and RDT&E. And similar to what I said in our intro, I do not believe legacy programs exist throughout the Air Force at large, but instead are tucked away into relevant directorates, offices, major commands, etc. that possess personnel with a need to know to access and facilitate the programs as well as the relevant infrastructure to operate within the programs. This project actually bypasses the tip of the spear of the Air Force, the civilian-led secretary of the Air Force, and directly labels elements of the half or the headquarters of the Air Force, the top level Air Force military staff that supports directly the Secretary of the Air Force and Air Force Chief of Staff as housing UFO Legacy Program operations. And that will lead us to our first major revelation that we will explore today. I would like to directly state the vast majority of Air Force UFO Legacy Program operations reside within the Air Force Secretariat, specifically Air Force Acquisition or SAF AQ. Throughout this project, I will label several directorates under SAF AQ and its assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition technology and logistics as serving imperative roles in the Air Force's efforts to retrieve down and exploit nonhuman technical vehicles. These being SAF AQL or Air Force special programs, SAF AQX or acquisition integration and SAF AQR or science, technology and engineering. Indeed, I believe the controlling entity with oversight of air force acquisition legacy programs is an office praised for its accelerated methods for developing, acquiring, and fielding critical combat capabilities. An office with the ability to operate within the gray area of standard acquisition without bureaucratic oversight or hurdles with access to near limitless funding. The Air Force Acquisition Rapid Capabilities Office or RCO outside of SAF AQ and RCO. I will outline several offices under the administrative assistant the Secretary of the Air Force. These will include saf ah sensitive activities and safaz security/ special programs oversight/info protection. Ultimately I will propose a theory that actual rdtn of exotic vehicles and derivative technologies are conducted out of air staff compliance under air force test and evaluation or aft and explore test and evaluation subordinate three-letter organizations. And these include AFTTE or policy and programs, AFTER or resource integration and AFTEZ the special programs division. And I will investigate how day-to-day operations of legacy programs housed within the headquarters of the Air Force are actually supported by the next layer of the Air Force structural pyramid and these are MAGCOMs or major commands. Out of the nine active MAGCOMs, we will solo out Air Combat Command ACC, Air Force Special Operations Command or AFSOC, Air Mobility Command or AMC, and most critically, Air Force Material Command or AFMC. This will lead us to analyze the history of AFMC and its precursor entities that connects shockingly to prior crash retrieval events I have covered in the past. and analyze AFMC's component units, including Air Force Research Lab, AFRL, and the Air Force Test Center, AFTC, formerly the Air Force Flight Test Center, AFTTC. And ultimately we will arrive at a thesis that multiple Air Force major range and test facility bases or MRTFBS including the UTR Utah test and training range, NTR Nevada test and training range and most critically the Edwards 412th test wing operate under the Air Force Test Center along with the above listed entities to perform RDT&E or again research development test and evaluation of both nonhuman vehicles that humans have found a way to interface with and derivative technologies or alien reproduction vehicles. And of course, guys, you know me. We will analyze the programs from a program protection lens and produce the AFOSIP PJ or Air Force Office of Special Investigations special projects along with their cadre of FBI agents as the insider and outsider threat protection element to programs focused on nonhuman technical vehicles. Of course, in the NRO project, I took a risk introducing 13 possible gatekeepers and high-level legacy personnel. Most of these names had been discussed by me or others in the public realm before. So, there was actually relatively little risk here. Therefore, I say strap in because in this project, I will produce names of alleged legacy program gatekeepers and personnel that I actually encourage the administration to subpoena or serve interrogatories to that I guarantee you have never heard before. After all, our study of AFOSIPJ will lead us to the gatekeeper of UFO saps and USPS that I consider a truly evil boogeyman. A name that I believe I might be taking on a great personal risk by discussing this being one Mr. Terry Phillips, senior executive service, former PJ executive director and Air Force special access program security director and current vice president for security at Northrup Grumman. And we will also investigate Philip successor in both PJ and Air Force SAPS, special agent Lee M. Russ. We will also identify senior executive service tier 2 personnel Russell E. Wiler, former director of SAF AAH or sensitive activities, and William E. Mccclure, former director security special program oversight and information protection or SAF AAZ, and actually argue why I believe one of these two men was listed as the Air Force SES2 gatekeeper by Christopher Melon in a redacted signal exchange. As I wrap up this executive summary, I cannot stress enough the importance of the rapid capabilities office under acquisition again RCO. So we will also identify director and program executive officer for the department of the air force RCO, Mr. Randall G. Walden. Numerous, and I mean numerous more names will be listed throughout this project, such as Lawrence J. Delaney, Sus Payton, Don Dunlop, and many more. But I cannot stress enough the importance of this select group of individuals that I would consider hostile witnesses as gatekeepers and extremely senior legacy program personnel. And I'll list them again just so nothing gets lost in translation. Terry Phillips, Lee Russ, William Mccclure, Russell Wiler, and Randall Walden. There is so much more in today's project. I fully recommend sticking with me throughout the whole thing. But with that being said, let's go ahead and investigate. As I stated in the beginning of this video, the direct goal of this project is to investigate and unveil the modern-day structure of Air Force UFO legacy programs. To do so, I think it is imperative to investigate the skeleton of the department of the air force or daff directorates and positions within the headquarters of the air force, the half air force major commands or MAGCOMs, detachments within MAGCOMs, air force major range and test facility bases or MRTFBs. This project will grow increasingly and incredibly complex. So bear with me here as we work through some complicated relationships, acronyms, naming conventions, etc. Recall my UFO legacy program pyramid. I do think it pertinent to begin our analysis of Air Force legacy programs within the program admin layer of my pyramid. As I state often, I do not think the overwhelming majority of UFO legacy programs are contractor-led and run with a complete lack of oversight. Indeed, I strongly believe such programs are conducted with strict, stripped, and parallel chains of oversight. From what I understand, the vast majority of legacy programs harness the defense industrial base and elements of the DoD/IC to accomplish these exotic missions that requires unrivaled secrecy, funding mechanisms, scientific and technical prowess, RDT& expertise, etc., and thus massage the US black budget and exploit SAPs, USPS, and CAPS to render these programs completely inaccessible to those not read in even presidents who are considered quote unquote temporary employees. Whilst SAPs, USPS, and CAPS are already programs critical to US national security bolstered by strict controls, need to know access and security measures. Such programs are still reported to Congress regardless of how deeply entrenched they are in the US black budget. Thus, this is why legacy program operations likely introduce further classifications to special access programs, making such programs waved and bigoted and sprinkle on some creative Department of Energy classifications inherited from the 1954 atomic energy agreement, such as special nuclear materials, non-contract foreign intelligence information, and transclassified foreign nuclear information. to keep these programs inaccessible from even the US gang of eight. I really can't think of anyone who explains this better than David Grush himself. >> Mr. Grush, as a result of your previous government work, have you met with people with direct knowledge or have direct knowledge yourself of non-human origin craft? >> Yes, I personally interviewed those individuals. >> Mr. Rush, as a result of your previous government work, have you met with people with direct knowledge or have direct knowledge yourself about ATS, advanced technologies that the US government has? >> Uh based on uh conventional uh advanced tech, I was briefed to uh the preponderance of the defense departments both space and aerospace department of programs. Yeah. >> Do you have knowledge or do you have reason to believe that there are programs in the advanced tech space that are unsanctioned? Uh yes I do. >> Okay. Yeah. And and when you say that they're above congressional oversight, what do you mean? >> Uh complicated question. Uh so there's you know some I would call it abuse here. So congressional oversight of conventional spe special access programs and I'll use title 10. So DoD as an example, right? So 10 US code section 119 discusses congressional oversight of saps discusses the the depth sect def's ability to wave congressional reporting. However, the gang of eight is at least supposed to be notified if a you know a wave or wave bigoted unagnowledged sap is created and that's public law to peak behind the veil of such extensive program security and protection. I believe we can find value in uncovering Air Force legacy program structure by expecting to peel back numerous layers and glance between the lines of a complex organizational structure to decipher where legacy programs lie and are executed through a strict chain of command and oversight. Indeed, just like my UFO legacy program pyramid, I think we can find tremendous value in working our way down the Air Force organizational structure pyramid. So, let's work our way down here, focusing majorly on the half, headquarters of the Air Force, MAGCOMs, major commands, NAFS, numbered air forces, and wings. And don't worry, I'll explain all of these in greater detail. Let's start by reviewing this organizational chart of the DAFF or Department of Air Force. And yeah, I know a lot of acronyms already. The DAFF exists as the overarching entity encompassing the entirety of the Air Force and Space Force led by the civilian position of the Secretary of the Air Force. Within the daff exists the half or headquarters of the air force which refers to the air staff the top military leadership supporting the secretary of the air force. I think by analyzing specific compartments within the daff specifically the half we can clearly identify and isolate critical components engaged in air force legacy program efforts. Think back to some of my other work and extend some examples here, such as how much I talk about the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology in support of CIA programs or the USD ANS under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment under the Secretary of Defense in support of both NRO and National Security Council programs because I believe analyzing the half or again headquarters of the Air Force in support of the Secretary of the Air Force is a mere pursuit and will bear much fruit. So where do we turn our attention first? Well, just like I did in my NRO project, let us go ahead and look to air force acquisition within the upper echelons of the headquarters of the air force or again the half resides air force acquisitions or saf as I will refer to it from here on out. SAFQ is chiefded by the assistant secretary of the air force for acquisition technology and logistics and like a running theme of today is comprised of multiple subordinate directorates and if you've been paying attention so far you already know we will zero in on specific directorates under Safa Q and just here take a second to already observe layers within layers in the air force under the secretary of the air force exists numerous half position supporting the office of the secretary of the air force including the assistant secretary of the air force for acquisition technology and logistics itself comprised of multiple subdirectorates. SAFQ quote oversees air force research development acquisition and program sustainment activities totaling an annual budget in excess of $60 billion for more than $550 acquisition programs. End quote. and operates under the vision to quote deliver enduring worldclass capabilities to asssure air space and cyerspace dominance for the nation and our allies end quote. Historically, SAFQ has provided direction, guidance and supervision of all matters pertaining to the formulation, review, approval and execution of acquisition plans, policies and programs. and these include the F-35 Lightning 2 and B-21 Raider programs. Not only is SAQ responsible for air force science and technology or S&T matters but also quote basic research, applied research and advanced technology development including the air force portion of joint programs end quote as well as a whole list of other responsibilities including the governance of developing planning prototyping and experimentation efforts technology integration into air force requirements and pre-acquisition program planning. planning, management of and policy relating to the Air Force manufacturing technology program, Air Force contracting, research, development, production and product supportive weapons, direct collaboration with AFTTE or test and evaluation and so much more. SAFQ is so critical to Air Force science and technology efforts. The position is in charge of appointing the commander of the Air Force Research Lab or AFRL, the primary R&D arm of the Air Force and piece of Air Force Material Command, AFMC MAGCOM as a technology executive officer for select programs. So what I just said that SappaQ and AFL work closely remember this as later in the project specifically on the MCOM section I will make some insane ties between AFL and a littleknown character who is somewhat famous on this channel the illustrious Dr. Eric H Wang. So yeah, if programs exist focused on the recovery, storage, exploitation, and derivation of nonhuman technologies, SAF AQ would likely be one of the OPRs or offices of primary responsibility dealing with these deepixed use apps. But before we go any further on SAFQ, remember that acquisitions are not a new topic to my investigations. After all, the crux of my NRO investigation into legacy programs was that indeed NRO programs are likely housed within NRO acquisitions controlled by departments under the SECDE and ODNI. Indeed, I now recall mention of one witness, Ed, who will appear time and time again throughout this video and has appeared time and time throughout my project portfolio. Ed served several positions within both the Air Force Test Center AFTC at the Edwards 412 Test Wing as an Air Force officer and at the Pentagon as a civilian. As I have discussed ad nauseium on this channel, Ed possesses years of firhand experience within a quote unquote hidden wing out in the Western Air Force ranges. an extensive waved and deep sixed set of programs across the Nevada test and training range, Edwards 412 test wing, Dougway, Utah test and training range, all MRTFBs by the way, and other DoD sites to test and evaluate recovered nonhuman vehicles as well as derivative vehicles one might call alien reproduction vehicles that employ, let's just say, exotic and non-conventional propulsion systems. Again, Ed and the 412th Test Wing MRTFB will come up again later on in this project. However, let's chat about my prior video on Ed. Ed was a witness who approached Steven Greer. So during a frantic year plus long effort to actually contact Ed and speak to him myself, I had to rely on Steven Greer's notes and documents on Ed's testimonies whilst comparing them against Ed's real and very prestigious CV. Due to Ed's CV, I did indeed believe Greer's retelling of Ed's disclosures. But guys, due to recent events I am keeping intentionally vague, my confidence in Ed's testimony has grown 10,000fold, and I've managed to garner myriad new insights into Ed's firsthand experience within the programs. So, let's get to our relevance to our current chapter here. Ed CV is riddled with acquisition and following his time within the quote unquote hidden wing. Ed served in the Pentagon connected to none else but SAFQ. It was in SAFQ that Ed learned that during consecutive fiscal years 30 to 40% of total Air Force TOA or total obligation authority budget was actually slashed and sent to the Air Force black budget before any analysis and assessment by Air Force FM or financial management. This SAFAQ siphoning of TOA funds into the black budget and programs focused on the TNE of derivative vehicles or alien reproduction vehicles is a direct example of egregious misappropriation of funds occurring within the headquarters of the Air Force under SAF AQ. >> Well, so that how does I mean I don't want to cut you off, but how does a program like that get funded? >> I will give you generalities. I can get very specific in a close session. uh but a mis misappropriation of funds and uh does >> that mean does that mean that there is money in the budget that is said to go to a program but it doesn't and it goes to something else >> yes I have specific knowledge of that yep >> so safaq deals with cuttingedge air force acquisition RDT& science and technology and according to ed is actually an inflection point where funds go black. So before we dive into directorates under SAF AQ, what else can we learn here? Perhaps, just perhaps, by analyzing prior individuals to hold the prestigious assistant secretary of the air force for acquisition technology and logistics position, we can find some individuals we can connect to UFO legacy programs. To start, from 1991 to 1992, SAFQ was spearheaded by one, Lawrence J. Delaney. Delane's career history is certainly rather engaging and appears similar to other gatekeepers we have talked about before on this channel such as Mary Kay Sturivant and gatekeepers we will talk about today such as Terry Phillips. After earning his PhD in chemical engineering, Delaney worked at the Institute for Defense Analysis from 1961 to 1962, a federally funded research and development center, FFRDC, sponsored by the DoD, that actually used to house the late former presidential adviser Harold Malgrren. Indeed, I believe Malgrren's IDA position was a knock or non-official cover position for his actual work within the CIA. After IDA, Delaney would move on to Aerospace Corporation, another FFRDC I strongly suspect engages in UFO legacy programs as director of its propulsion technology and systems study group. Following the aerospace corporation, Delaney moved on to Martin Marietta as director of advanced programs and director of its Navy systems division. Martin Marietta of course was one half of the now largest defense contractor in the world the illustrious Loheed Martin. I strongly believe that even pre merger Martin Marietta engaged in such UFO programs and please watch my Locky video to learn so much more there. Delaney would then join Science Applications International Corporation, infamously known as SIC, as deputy sector manager for military science and information systems sector. And then as manager of its information systems group, just as with Lockheed, if mention of SIC does not make any alarm bells go off in your head, go watch my video on that. And shortly before his position as assistant secretary for the Air Force ATNL, Delaney would even work for Bradock Dunn and Macdonald BDM, a contractor actually purchased by Northrup Grumman that like the aerospace corporation Martin Marietta and sic has a storied history of UFO legacy program accusations. I certainly think a reasonable argument can be made. Delaney indeed had exposure to UFO programs even before his tenure as head of SAFQ. Let's also investigate Susi Payton, also former SECAF ATNL or again assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition technology and logistics. Forgive me if I use the SECAF ATNL acronym from here on out. The former word is just so much to say. Anyways, Susie Payton served this position from 2006 to 2009 under George W. Bush. And if her name rings any bells to you, I actually briefly mentioned her in my project on SEIC. Prior to her position within SAFQ, beginning in 1989, Payton worked as senior site systems integration manager for Martin Marietta and then continued on in Loheed Martin postmerge until 1997 as manager of advanced technology in the office of the vice president of Loheed Martin. Other former SAFQ heads like John J. Welch Jr. enjoyed storied careers at LTV Aerospace, a former contractor that would become a CIA shell company called E Systems that I explored regarding accusations of LTV Aerospace designing electromagnetic pulse weapons designed to shoot down UFOs in my NRO project. Indeed, in eight of 14 of the former SAF AQS, we can find in-depth corporate history prior to government service featuring many of the contractors I've accused of engaging in UFO legacy programs. And again, eight of 14 prior SECAF ATNLS include either one or multiple of Loheed Martin, SIC, Northup, Grumman, TRW, LTV, Electro Systems or Aerospace, and General Dynamics. Just as our running theme of analyzing compartments within compartments here, I want to analyze specific directorates within SAQ that I either strongly believe or actually have direct knowledge engage with UFO legacy programs. These include to list out before we dive in. SAF AQR aka science technology and engineering, SAF AQX aka acquisition integration, and SAF AQL aka special programs. America's future will be determined by your dreams and your visions. For some of you will travel where no man has ever traveled before. Some of you will fly the fastest planes that have ever been built. Reach the highest altitude that man has ever gone to. >> Whether you serve in the skies above or on the ground below, >> each of you has stepped forward to defend your country. The American people support you. They are counting on you and they believe you truly do represent the best of America. SAF AQL or special programs quote direct SAP advanced technology development programs and monitors new technologies which may satisfy operational requirements or capitalize on technology opportunities in coordination with the SAF. AQR or again science, technology and engineering end quote. Indeed, this directorate under SECAF ATNL manages the development and execution of highly classified and sensitive acquisition programs within the air force. SAF AQL quote serves as the principal acquisition adviser to the SECAF SESAF under secretary of the Air Force USA and SAF AQ on all matters involving special access programs and liazes with other military services, defense agencies and federal departments to ensure cross fertilization of advanced technologies and concepts to explore the potential for joint cooperation activities. End quote. Within its duties, AQL plans, programs, directs, and accomplishes research, development, test, and evaluation, or one of my most used acronyms, RDT&E, for promising advanced air, space, and cyber capabilities. As we just stated, SAFAQL Special Programs works closely with SAF AQR, science, technology, and engineering. And as you'll come to find out here, I think there's quite a bit of value in exploring that relationship. SAF AQR quote serves as the Air Force Science and Technology Executive to represent, advocate, and defend the Air Force S&T program to the Office of the Secretary of Defense OSD, the other services, and Congress. End quotes. Indeed, SAF AQR specifically, as we discussed earlier, interfaces with technology executive officers, TUOs, from the Air Force Research Lab, AFRL, under Air Force Material Command, AFNC, for all Air Force Science and Technology Programs, SAF AQR, and AFRL Commander work closely with the OSD or again the Office of the Secretary of Defense funding and program management structure for several technology transfer vessels. And again, think back to Ed and his time in Air Force acquisition at the Pentagon. I guess then it should really be no surprise here that the USDA ANS or under secretary for defense for acquisition and sustainment, a department within the OSD I recently identified as an integral administrator to NRO UFO legacy programs, partners with the SAFQ. I then can't help but wonder if the National Security Council utilizes partnerships between USDA ANS and SAF AQ, specifically SAP AQR for clandestine UFO related purposes and possibly use technology transfer vessels to slashbudget or hide materials. What I find equally interesting here is the relationship between SAF AQR and SAF AQL. SAF AQR quote integrates special access program and non-SAP RDT&E S&T planning activities and strategies and directs advanced technology development programs and monitors new technologies in coordination with SAFQL. End quote. This is really important. So let me say that again. What did we just read there? that SAF AQR and SAF AQL coordinate on Air Force RDT&E SAPS and together monitor new technologies. While I certainly strongly suspect and I would wager that you do too, that within this scope of responsibility, our deep six RDT& SAPS focused on the recovery and exploitation of quote unquote new technologies of unknown origin. The last trio of directorates under SECAF ATNL I want to talk about SAF AQX aka acquisition integration is not such a lowhanging fruit as special programs in science technology and engineering. SAF AQX could be thought of as the lubricant that helps a welloiled machine run smoothly and efficiently. AQX acquisition integration oversees and quote develops and implements plans, policies and procedures related to air force acquisition management, reporting, structure and execution end quote. So whilst we have AQR and AQL coordinate on clandestine RDT& SAPS, it is the AQX that helps ensure operations run smoothly and efficiently with their administration and management role. One of SAF AQX's most critical tasks is continuous process improvement support to a variety of Air Force teams identifying both near-term and long-term as well as lasting strategic and tactical changes to Air Force processes. Per its name, acquisition integration, SAF AQX additionally operates in a role of integration and oversight, consolidating requests for the release of funds, reviewing program performance metrics, and ensuring overall acquisition policies are implemented consistently. So as per our investigation so far, SAF AQ and its subcomponents AQX, AQL and AQR alongside standard Air Force acquisition frameworks deal with the most highly secretive and clandestine science and technology projects relegated to SAPS and USAPS in the entire Air Force. As I state often, UFO legacy programs operate not without oversight, but under their own stripped oversight channels that minimize eyes on the programs and readin personnel and maximizes efficiency, program protection, and compartmentalization. Therefore, the question must be asked, is there a vehicle within SAFAQ that would allow AQ to engage with UFO legacy program operations while completely sidest stepping congressional reporting in the standard red tape bureaucratic process? Well, of course, the answer here is yes, and this would be the Department of the Air Force's Rapid Capabilities Office or RCO that resides within acquisition under the Office of the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition Technology and Logistics. RCO has accelerated methods for developing, acquiring, and fielding critical combat capabilities. This office quote preserves the strength of US ingenuity and innovation without the rigidity of traditional acquisition end quote. With an assigned personnel of less than 200 individuals, the RCO delivers capabilities at the speed of emerging threats. Specifically here, the RCO expedites the development and fielding of select Department of Defense combat support and weapons systems, leverages defensewide technology development efforts and existing operational capabilities, provides integration and technical support to other services or US government activities. Conducts independent operational and technical assessment of weapons or combat support system capabilities and vulnerabilities. takes on new challenges to accelerate operationally focused capabilities and much more. Today, the DAFF RCO portfolio includes several high priority developmental and experimental programs and these include the B-21 Raider, the successor to the B2 Spirit Bomber and the X37B orbit test vehicle. Now, what is most interesting to me is who the RCO reports to. As we just discussed, Air Force acquisition would require a strict oversight chain with minimal eyes and interference to run UFO programs. And of course, the RCO does just that with key operating principles of the RCO including a quote short and narrow chain of command, early and prominent warfighter involvement in funding stability end quote. And this is where it gets interesting. The office the RCO reports to, well, this is a board of directors chaired by none other than the USDA ANS or under secretary of defense for acquisition and sustainment. We've already talked about the USD ANS, but if you view my channel regularly, this should set off massive alarm bells. As a critical component of my NRO video was exploring relationships between UFO Legacy Program Gatekeepers/personnel and the NRO and USD ANS, or its former name, the USDT. This board chaired by the USD ANS that directs the RCO includes the Secretary of the Air Force, Air Force Chief of Staff, the Chief of Space Operations, the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition, and the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering. It is my expressed understanding from individuals with firstirhand experience in air force legacy programs that the RCO can take SAFAQ involvement in such programs and package it neatly as a controlling office built to operate within the gray area of standard acquisition. This in turn allows air force acquisition and the office of the ASACF ATNL to operate UFO legacy programs outside of congressional oversight, air force oversight, as well as temporary executive branch employees like presidents. Perhaps then we may find value in unmasking and analyzing the current RCO director and program executive officer or PEO and member of the senior executive service. A man I would encourage the current presidential administration to serve ample interrogatories to Randall G. Walden. Before his tenure as director and PEO of RCO, Walden was commissioned in the Air Force in 1982 and quote served as a flight test engineer within Air Force Material Command at Edwards Air Force Base, California. Puxen River Naval Air Station, Maryland and Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada. During his tours as a flight test engineer, Mr. Walden participated in the development, ground, and flight testing of numerous aerospace weapons systems. End quote. Edwards, Nellis, Pax River, Air Force Material Command, which we will discuss later, and Aerospace Weapon Systems should stand out as a red alert when investigating an individual with legacy program experience, as I believe these are critical Air Force program elements. What is super interesting to me is that from 1997 to 1998, Walden would actually serve as commander within a classified flight test squadron out of Nellis Air Force Base. Walden also served myriad roles within the Air Force Directorate of Special Programs, including deputy chief of advanced technology division, chief of the Special Studies Division, and Technical Director. Finally, before he took over as director and PEO of RCO, Walden served as director for Air Force Test and Evaluation or AFTTE. AFTTE, as we discussed in the executive summary, will soon be a critical component of our investigations. According to a rare speech given at Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies given in 2018, RCO facilitates over 30 programs equally secret or more secret to the B-21 Raider or X37B. Why don't we go ahead and listen to Walden speak about this himself because apparently according to Walden RCO under his watch is actually based on Lockheed Skunkworks in the early days of the NRO. And so what you see is on the far left we stole and plagiarized some of the models that existed uh because this nation and industry and actually government agencies have done streamline and tailored acquisition and requirements process for years. I pick a little bit from the locked skunk works model. Kelly Johnson shown up there. He has 15 rules. We typically use 10 of those 15. Uh for the most part, the National Reconnaissance Office in the early days uh was very streamlined um and got things done fairly quickly and again both from a requirements as well as an acquisition process point of view. Although it is quite dry, I do recommend checking out this speech given by Walden. Walden's answers do seem like something fed back from chat GPT on standard acquisition processes, but it is intriguing to hear him discuss just how rapid RCO is with a team of just 200 to 250 people. Now, remember this for later. Walden in this speech goes specifically out of his way to thank OSI or AFOSI for safeguarding the most secretive of RCO projects. um access to I'll say the security uh pieces out there. Uh we lean heavily on uh Air Force OSI. uh they help us through most of the programs that we do and that access in my mind is is fairly critical in the execution of certainly any of the uh defense department type weapon systems but more important associated with actually um securing the information we don't want to have our adversaries uh to get andor securing information that makes sense um in having a capability for the future uh that you're not a having to update or modernize based on a leak of information >> with the utmost confidence and I mean utmost confidence. I suspect that SAFQ, specifically the Directorates of Special Programs, Acquisition, Integration, and Science, Technology, and Engineering, are imperative to UFO RDT& operations, specifically programs involving derivative nonhuman technologies, and that these Air Force acquisition subcomponents utilize the rapid capabilities office to execute their tasking of UFO legacy programs with their own umbrella oversight authority and unlimited access to TOA funds thanks to the RCO when we discuss stripped oversight channels within legacy programs. This is exactly what I mean. While the entirety of the headquarters of the Air Force supporting the Secretary of the Air Force are likely completely unaware or denied access into UFO legacy programs. several ultra specific components, directorates and departments that would be mandatory to accomplish such massive scale. Exotic retrievalss and RDT&n are absolutely engaged in these bigoted deepixed waved unagnowledged use. And you know, at the very end here, since this project aims to uncover the modern-day UFO legacy program structure within the Air Force, I would be remiss if I didn't mention a senior Air Force general officer connected to SAFQ that I allege is involved within UFO Legacy Program Operations. Lieutenant General Donna D. Shipton currently serves as commander of the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio with additional duties as Air Force Program Executive Officer for Combat Readiness and Integrating PEO for mission systems. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center, AFL CMC, is one of six centers reporting to Air Force Material Command, which we will touch on in much greater detail later on. Immediately prior to her position under AFMC, Shipton served a very senior role within SAF AQ. From August 2022 to December 2023, Shipton served as military deputy in the office of the assistant secretary of the air force for ATNL at SAFQ. Shipton was quote responsible for research and development, test, production, production support, and modernization of Air Force programs worth more than 60 billion annually. End quote. And as I talk about in so many of my videos, and I love referencing the work of Katherine Austin Fitz, with UFO legacy programs, we are looking at figures not just billions, but possibly trillions. I do not think it is inconceivable for the Air Force total program requirements for RDT&E and reverse engineering of nonhuman vehicles totals over the figures of hundreds of billions into the low trillions. Though I do not have a trail to expand on this now, I highly encourage you to keep LTG Shipton in your mind moving forward and strongly encourage the administration to pass on a friendly subpoena. Outside of Air Force acquisitions in the RCO, there are actually several more elements of the half I believe are absolutely imperative to our discussion today. And the two we will talk about are actually sister departments called SAF AHA or sensitive activities and SAF AAZ security/ special programs oversight/info protection. And just note these organizations have undergone some name changes in the last couple of years, but I still think SAF AAZ and AAH is our best way to reference these offices. SAF AHA and SAF AAZ fall under the administrative assistant of the secretary of the air force within of course the headquarters of the air force. sensitive activities here. SAF AHA according to a 2014 half mission directive with OPR or again office of primary responsibility being the SAF AHA. We can learn that this office exists as a directorate within the SAF AA or again administrative assistant to the secretary of the air force. Very little and I mean very little is publicly available about air force sensitive activities. But fortunately, this 2014 half directive can tell us just a little bit more. We can learn that SAF ah quote serves as the United States Air Force office of primary responsibility and single enterprise to address immediate and emerging combat air force combat support agency and combatant commander mission needs involving sensitive activities and operational concepts. This includes those sensitive activities as defined in DODIS-5210.36 involving other non DODD federal departments and agencies. End quote. Believe it or not, I reckon even such a short blurb gives us quite a bit to chew through. Classified DoD directive S-5210.36 was established on 6th November 2008 and is titled quote provision of DoD sensitive support to DoD components and other departments and agencies of the US government end quote. While we cannot really decipher these quote unquote sensitive activities under this classified DoD directive, perhaps we can decipher some meaningful information from analyzing the office of primary responsibility for this directive that the SAF AHA operates to satisfy this OPR for SAF AHA operations under this classified directive. Well, this would be the under secretary of defense for intelligence and security or as you know I like to say USD INS. USD INS just like USD ANS is a highle department within the OSD or office of the secretary of defense that essentially functions as a critical directorate. USDINS operates within intelligence, counter intelligence, security, sensitive activities, etc. matters for the DoD and even exercises oversight over the DIA, NGA, NRO, and NSA. In my NRO project, of course, we discuss the USD ANS and its IC counterparts, the DDNI ATNF. While the USD INS seems to bridge that gap on its own, as it is actually a dual hated role with the director also serving as the director of defense intelligence under the ODNI. Not only do I wager USD INS is integral to National Security Council UFO legacy programs, but may in fact be one of the most critical lynch pins. And you might be asking, why do I theorize the USD insynch? To address that, let's quickly reference here the NPMS or national program special management staff with specific emphasis on the director of NPMS. NPMS director runs coordination between the National Security Council SAPS of course if you forgot somehow SAPS are special access programs and the US Department of Defense/Intelligence community. The director of the NPMS is one of the most critical jobs in the entirety of the United States that I'm willing to bet most people have actually never even heard of. The director of NPMS is usually the most cleared person in the entire DoD besides the Secretary of Defense. Indeed, the director of the NPMS is even more cleared than the director for the DoD Special Access Program Central Office or SAPCO. And if you've watched any of my previous videos, you will know how important SAPCO is, as well as the special access program oversight committee is to UFO legacy programs. And of course, I say this because national special program management staff, including the NPMS director, reside within the USDNS, but specifically NPMS falls under USD's intelligence dual-headed role. This of course is again the director for defense intelligence and NPMS falls under SAS P or sensitive activities and special programs. Sensitive activities and special programs. Well, does this ring a bell with SAF AH sensitive activities and SAF AQL special programs? I bet it does. I am really willing to go out on a limb here and not only say that UFO legacy programs out of the National Security Council heavily feature involvement from the USD INS, but that also one of the most integral quote unquote above board roles in the entirety of NSEled UFO programs is indeed the director of NPMS under the USD INS. And real quick, I can't let this slip away regarding the USDs. This is a position you may have heard from before without even realizing it. After all, on 20 July 2022, sitting under secretary for defense for intelligence and security, Ronald S. Moltry would inform the DoD of the creation of Arrow, as well as the installation of Moltry's good buddy and legacy program stoogge, Shawn Kirkpatre, as Arrow's director. USDINS Moltry helped establish Arrow and provide oversight and direction to Arrow in numerous primary lines of operations including surveillance, collection and reporting, intelligence operations and analysis, science and technology and more. I think what's missing here is Arrow serving as a honeypot for whistleblowers that Moltry engaged with. Indeed, both Kirkpatre and Moltry would enjoy gallivanting around together in 2022, dismissing the topic of UFOs outright. Shan Kirkpatre, a man whose lies, deception, and interference against whistleblowers, will never be forgotten, seemingly punched his ticket following his work with Arrow. In my opinion, earning his reward for acting as Legacy Program's public program protection frontman. You can say categorically you've seen no convincing confirmable evidence of intact spacecraft kept by the US government. >> No, I have seen nothing that leads me to that conclusion. >> Is it possible there is some secret program that you're just not aware of? >> I don't think so. I have access to anything and everything I need. by joining Oakidge National Labs FFRDC as chief technology officer for defense and intelligence programs. Due to several videos exploring rumors of recovered UFO systems analysis at Oakidge, I have publicly theorized this position involved Sha Kirkpatre's introduction to firstirhand science and technology work on UFOs. Curiously, Oakidge deleted this job posting and Kirkpatre does not feature Oakidge on his public CV. Moltry himself is not innocent of deleting job history, in my opinion, to cover his tracks. Sure, Moltry served as an intelligence advisory board member within the MITER Corporation as well as board member for the Better Angel Society, which is owned by the Carile Group. But Moltry also erased Battel Memorial Institute from his public CV. For nearly two years, Moltry served as an advisory board member for Battel Memorial Institute. And an intriguing tie between both of these deleted positions between Moltry and Kirk Patrick. Well, of course, the Oakidge National Lab FFRDC is managed by none other than Battel. incredibly concerning behavior from a former USDS. But alas, according to my research and understanding, this position is integral to UFO programs. I say all this because I find it intriguing SAF ah or again sensitive activities is basically governed by classified directives outlined by the USD ins. I am confident a strong argument could be made further classified DoD directives whose origins can be traced back to classified presidential executive orders under presidents Truman and Eisenhower sees SAF ah coordinate with the NPMS and USDS for modern-day National Security Council crash retrieval and reverse engineering programs. Think about it this way. SAF AHA sensitive activities addresses immediate combat air force combat support agency and combatant commanders mission needs involving sensitive activities and operational concepts under classified USD INS guidelines. What if the combatant commands in question are commands like SOCOM or special operations command that requires sensitive activities to operate UFO crash retrievals on foreign soil with ISR provided by combat support agencies like the NGA? What if Air Combat Command, a major commander MGCOM headquartered at Langley Air Force Base, seeks to harness asymmetrical warfare advantages by deploying derivative technologies adapted to US airframes? Well, I certainly think this would be a quote unquote operational concept SAF AHA would coordinate with the MAGCOM. I mean, just my theory, but possibly this has even happened before. Think back to the testimony of whistleblower and American hero Dylan Borland, who observed a triangular airframe with black flight paint that both displayed puzzling characteristics and seemingly employed an electrooptic cloaking system that appeared like flowing lava outside of the craft. Where did Borland see this craft? Well, of course, over Langley Air Force Base in the mid200s. >> Uh, Mr. Borland. In your testimony, you describe witnessing large triangular craft while stationed at Langley Air Force Base in 2012. Can you explain what you observed in terms of size behavior and why you're confident it was not conventional technology? >> Great question, ma'am. Um, so on barracks on the base, I lived in the barracks. There was a little smoke pit outside. I was there uh on the telephone and looking across to the flight line and I see a white light pop up and stop about 100 feet in the air. I thought it was a weather balloon. I've seen tests from there before. Uh weak night, you know, normal thing, not surprising. I uh actually finish my cigarette and I begin walking up towards the flight line. There is a track and because I was on three months of night work, I began I would walk the track at night when we were weathered down. And as I began walking towards the light towards the flight line in the track, the light then flies across the base across the flight line. And as it flies to me, a triangle manifests around the light. I can't tell you if it's active camouflage. I can't tell you if it appeared around the light, but I can tell you that it was a white light and then it was a triangle. It stopped about 100 feet in front of me and approximately 100 feet above me. My te telephone got extremely hot, completely froze, dead. Um, I remember how thick it was. It was between one to two stories thick, equilateral triangle. I could never see the top of it and the edges were 90 degree 90 degrees. There were four lights in total. Uh one light on each corner and a larger light in the center two to three times the size of the corner lights. But what was really odd was the outside. The best way to describe it is like looking at a James Webb telescope picture where you have the colors and then the black background. So, the craft itself was this black metallic flake paint, but on top of the craft was this gold, lava, plasma, some type of fluid going over and around the craft. I'm under this for about two to three minutes. Um, and then the center light flashes two to three times. No sound. Immediately shoots up to commercial jet level minimum in my opinion. Um, and I immediately feel static electricity all over my body. And then I smell the smell of after a thunderstorm or lightning storm that that really strong summer thunderstorm smell. >> Now this is why I love what I do so much. I would like to now introduce some research from my friend Alex Catz. That incidentally dovetales perfectly into our topic today specifically here of course saf ah. On 23 April 2024, Christopher Melon took to Twitter to release partially redacted screenshots of a signal exchange with an unknown individual. And full transparency before we dive in, I do hesitate to trust Melon. Outside of his involvement with Lou Alzando with the fake ATIP cover program, Melon formerly served as the deputy assistant secretary of defense for intelligence for the Clinton and Bush administrations, a position that serves under the now USD INS we discussed today extensively in connection to NSC UFO programs. Additionally, I believe Melon may be protecting his former SSCI or Senate Select Committee on Intelligence colleague, a career CIA spook and decadesl long VP of Loheed Martin for both government affairs and intelligence joint and science and technology programs, a woman named Mary Sturivant. Regardless, it is clear that Melon Alzando and their faction possibly stemming from the NSE itself have pushed for limited transparency. And while I disagree with this fully, I do take this exchange seriously. Within this exchange dated 2020, the unknown individual communicating with Melon stated themselves and others were making massive progress in accessing the UFO crash retrieval portfolio. In a redacted response from Melon, we can make out the year 1945. Melon's conversation partner stated their group was dealing with the recovered UFO that landed in Kingman, Arizona in 1953. The Kingman crash is one of my all-time favorite crash retrieval cases and in my opinion a real instance of a recovered nonhuman intelligence craft. I have covered Kingman before, though full transparency, the project is a little bit dated, so at some point I may actually revisit it. Also keep Kingman in your mind as personnel alleged to have operated on the Kingman craft will be critical to our MAGCOM section. Anyways, Melon's partner claimed they had deciphered the management structure and security control system and ownership of the crash retrieval portfolio. Quote, we also know who recovered landed or crashed UAPs and under what authority. We also know that a still highly classified memo by a secretary of the air force in the 1950s is still in effect to maintain the cover on UAPs. End quote. Not sure why brave men outside of David Grush haven't come forward to reveal this management and security structure, but I do hope this project today partially accomplishes that goal. The partner then stated, "We also know the SCES2 who's the Air Force gatekeeper." End quote. Followed by a redacted name. Now again, what is an SCES or senior executive service? SCEs is a highle civilian executive role within the federal government. SCES personnel handle significant responsibilities just below top political appointees such as a secretary, director, deputy secretary or deputy director, under secretary, etc. of a cabinet level department or agency. SCEs personnel are equivalent to a flag officer or general officer and thus an SCES2 you could think of as equivalent to a twostar or major general. This is where Alex Katz's work comes in and ties into today. CAT sought to decipher this redacted gatekeeper and began by analyzing SCES2 personnel around 2020 who also likely held senior positions in the Air Force whilst also factoring in total character count in the redacted name. You see, Catz performed analysis on the text and reasoned the gatekeeper's first and last name was a total of 12 characters. This is where Cats arrived upon the name Russell E. Wiler, a member of the Defense Intelligence Senior Executive Service. Wiler enjoyed a distinguished 36 career in the army where he retired in 2009. From 2009 to 2024, Wiler served as the director of the sensitive activities office safh within the office of the administrative assistant to the secretary of the air force in the headquarters of the air force, Arlington, Virginia. From 2024 to 2025, Wiler now serves as the director of plans and effects within the Office of Competitive Activities. And here is where things get interesting. In 2024, the Secretary of the Air Force introduced sweeping changes to quote unquote reoptimize and modernize the Department of the Air Force. Part of these changes was morphing SAF AHA sensitive activities into Air Force competitive activities SAF OC under the director of plans and effects SAF OCX. SAF AHA morphing under SAF OCX in 2024 really isn't that important to our investigation, but it is critical to proving that Wiler is in fact an SCES2. Very little can be found about Wiler online besides his bio, images of him as a young army officer, and photos of Wiler within AFJ ROC news and notes. I believe he has done a great job largely scrubbing himself from the internet. But intriguingly, this half chart we have been referencing all day has put Wiler's name right in front of our faces. Yet still, nothing we found yet can prove Wiler is an SCS2. Well, fortunately here, Cat saved this now deleted 2025 job opening under the Office of Competitive Activities, SAFOC, hiring for the new director of plans and effects, SAF OCX, Wiler's former position and continuation of SAF AH. This job opening implies that Wiler retired around mid 2025. This job opening for Wiler's former position was for tier 2 SCES and dises only. Dises being defense intelligence senior executive service which was the title that Wiler held. This here definitively proves director of plans and effects under SAF OCX and director of sensitive activities under SAF AH holds an SCES2 position and thus Wiler was an SCES2. How intriguing is it that Katz's brilliant work has proposed a possible SCES2 gatekeeper for Air Force UFO legacy programs? A possible gatekeeper that also served as director for Air Force sensitive activities SAP ah for 15 years who would then go on to serve as the continuation of SAP AAH in SAP OCX up to 2025. According to Wiler's bio, quote, "He is designated as the Air Force focal point to address immediate, near-term, and emerging combat air force, combat support agency, and combatant commander mission needs involving applications and operational concepts employing specialized lowdensity expertise and sensitive activities managed by other government agencies." End quote. Does this sound familiar? Because recall how SAF ah operates under the guidelines of DoD classified directive DODI S-5210.36 under OPRUSD INS for combat air force combat support agency and combatant commands that we recently theorized is connected to UFO clandestine operations. Katz's proposition of Wiler under SAF ah serving as a highlevel Air Force legacy program gatekeeper certainly correlates strongly with our work today. Now I personally believe that Wiler is one of two possibilities for this SCS2 gatekeeper that Melon described. I would like to extend my hand in unmasking an individual I believe has a strong argument for Melon suspect but also an individual I am certain has engaged with Air Force legacy programs staying under the SAF AA or administrative assistant to the secretary of the air force here we can look to a similar office to Wiler SA ah sensitive activities and observe SAF aaz security/ special program oversight/info protection By title description alone, you may be already associating info protection with gatekeeping. But let's continue to explore. SAF AAZ here, quote, provides a strategic policy focus on the Air Force security enterprise and on protection of information across the Air Force. End quote. And another quote here, quote, SAFAF AAZ manages the Air Force information security program. To include nuclear information security, and a quick break from this quote, if you have watched even a single one of my videos, you will know how important mclassifying and transclassifying nuclear material is to UFO legacy programs. Back to the quote. Personnel security program and industrial security program acts as the Air Force focal point for the insider threat program and serves as the Air Force special access program central office SAPCO and the authorizing official for Air Force SAP Systems. End quote. So, is there anyone connected to SAF AAZ that could fit the billet of Melon's SCES2 gatekeeper? because I do not think I need to go out on a limb here and state that SAF AAZ is integral to Air Force Legacy Program protection. Well, of course, the answer here is yes, and I will volunteer the name William E. Mccclure and implore the current administration to serve this individual in derogatories or subpoena just as they should Widiler. William E. Mccclure is a member of the senior executive service tier 2 and former director of SAF AAZ from 2019 to 2021. As director of SAF AAZ, Mccclure provided quote security leadership, policy direction, integration, and oversight of the Air Force special access program and information protection enterprise to protect the nation's most sensitive information technologies and capabilities. in this capacity, he is also the functional manager of the Air Force's 2,000 plus member security community." End quote. Now, obviously, Mccclure's role directly implies program protection strategies, as does his former SCS2 label satisfy Melon's gatekeeper conditions. Yet, recall Cats derived a 12 character name length in the redacted signal exchange. Russell Wiler, of course, is indeed 12 characters. Now obviously William Mccclure consists of 14 characters and Will Mccclure consists of 11 characters. So while Mccclur's naming convention is close to Cats's derived characters, it is not exactly spot-on. I personally believe that this 12 character count likely has an error of plus or minus two characters. And since numerous Air Force biographies display middle names such as William E. Mccclure, there is some wiggle room here. But after all on LinkedIn, Mccclure goes by Bill Mccclure and Bill E. Mccclure does indeed have 12 characters. So maybe after all, this condition is still satisfied. Now let us zoom back out to the overview of the Department of the Air Force and narrow in on one more absolutely crucial component within the headquarters of the Air Force. within the air staff under compliance. I would like to narrow in on aft or the office of the director of test and evaluation for the air force. Now aft is indeed different than safr or again the science technology and engineering directorate under the assistant secretary of the air force for acquisition technology and logistics. Though the director of air force test and evaluation does work closely and in cooperation with the SAFQ by studying headquarters air force mission directive 1-52 dated 20 April 2021 we can learn the director of air force test and evaluation or TNE serves as the senior test executive for both the air force and space force. AFTTE functions as quote the chief T& adviser to the DAFF senior leadership, developing T& policy and establishing TE guidance, advocating for test resources to support weapon system development, and resolving developmental and operational test programmatic issues. End quote. Basically, AFTTE is the tip of the spear for all Air Force test and evaluation programs. AFTTE provides guidance, direction, and oversight for all matters pertaining to the formulation, review, and execution of T& plans, policies, programs, and budgets. And of course, I will make the argument such T& programs under AFTTE include the reverse engineering and derivation of nonhuman technologies. Indeed, let's already circle back to some of my work and most prominent hypotheses. AFTTE possesses quote authority relating to the management and operation of specific DoD TN activities as delegated to the SECAF pursuant to the Department of Defense directive 32000.11 major range and test facility base. End quote. If you have watched even a single one of my videos in the past year, one of my most common talking points revolves around major range and test facility bases or MRTFBs and how I believe these 23 defense quote unquote critical cores are paramount to UFO legacy program operations. 23 such MRTFBs exist across the continental United States. eight Army, six Navy, seven Air Force, and two Defense Agency. These seven Air Force MRTFBs include the 412th Test Wing at Edwards Air Force Base, California. The Nevada Test and Training Range near Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada, the Utah Test and Training Range at Hill Air Force Base/Dougway Proving Ground in Utah. Air Force MRTFBs on the western range alone comprise over 5 million acres of land. The Utah test and training range here, which is also referred to as the UTTR or udder, which shares Dougway proving ground with Army MRTFB, the West Desert Test Center or WDTC, has been a major subject of my channel. In my investigation into Dougway Proving Ground, I discussed the testimony of witness MS, who as a contractor at Dougway claimed to stumble upon an intriguing disc housed in a hanger seemingly undergoing dismantling. >> Yeah, there's there is nothing on it. Not a seam, not not anything. Almost like it was like just casted. Yeah, like if you said it 3D printed, but yeah, it's flawless is what I can say. It's um it's stuff that you like nowadays there's there's no way to replicate it for us. >> I don't know if they were going to get ready to move it or whatever, but they they had it broke down. A lot of it was broke down. That bottom section was opened um where you could kind of see into that that component area. >> This encounter illustrated by MS occurred at Dougway's Avery area which touches on Michael Army airfield. an airirst strip at Dougway utilized by udder and the 388th range squadron out of nearby Hill Air Force Base and Hill Air Force Base of course is the primary airfield under the udder or again Utah test and training range. Interesting then that the alleged deep underground military base on Dougway specifically the West Desert Test C Center's Granite Peak is swarmed by the 388th Range Squadron radars and stations. Additionally, the NTR. I have discussed the NTR at length in the former Nevada test site, now Nevada National Security Site that is housed within the NTR. Much of this was discussed in my project on Sandia National Labs. But I also spoke of NTR in my NRO project when I discussed a source of mine that claimed to operate within an NROled UFO crash retrieval team based out of the NTR during the 2000s. Nevada Test and Training Range also exists within the testimony of the affforementioned Ed. Recall how Ed, a retired Air Force officer, stated he operated within a derivative technologies or alien reproduction vehicle program that was housed within the Edwards 412 test wing MRTFB that operated across Edwards, the NTR, and other installations on the quote unquote western ranges. Indeed, this makes perfectly logical sense to me, as within NTR exists two facilities infamous in UFO lore that I have actually spent a significant amount of time connecting to UFO legacy programs. the ever famous Area 51 actually occupied by the Edwards 412 test wing and the DOE's premier classified weapons testing range the Tonopa test range managed by Sandia National Labs and also occupied by the Edwards 412th test wing. So why do I believe AFTTE that operates as an authority relating to specific test and evaluation programs and concepts across Air Force major range and test facility bases deals with UFO legacy programs and based upon the MRTFBS I have covered in my own research specifically dealing with reverse engineering and exploitation of nonhuman craft. Well, for one here, I have held Ed's military records and papers within my own hands and read them with my own eyes. Whilst involved with the Edwards 412, where Ed literally states he served a critical role within a T& program for reverse engineered vehicles, Ed's OPR, or again, Office of Primary Responsibility here was AFTTE. And I would be remiss if I didn't take this Edward's time to quickly discuss an individual I strongly believe did indeed serve to gatekeep UFO legacy program operations from official channels and may have even operated within the programs on a TN level themselves. Major General Dawn M. Dunlop served as the director operational capability requirements deputy chief of staff for strategy integration and requirements within the headquarters of the air force from 2018 to 2019. Dunlop served as the director of the special access program central office aka the director of SAPCO. For a reference here, think back to the Wilson Davis notes. These notes are disputed to this day. Yet, I maintain the fundamental facts of the document regarding Vice Admiral Thomas Wilson being stonewalled in accessing UFO legacy programs are absolutely true. Within the notes, VADM Wilson received actionable intelligence from then director of SAPCO, Air Force General H. Marshall Ward regarding UFO legacy program records housed within the oustat, now USDAs. I do not think it is unreasonable to think the director of SAPCO to this day under the office of the secretary of defense serves a gatekeeping role to UFO legacy programs and possibly as we discussed earlier subordinate to the director of the NPMS. Perhaps then it is also interesting that from 2009 to 2012 Dunlop served as vice commander and commander of the Edwards 412 test wing. Oh, and yeah, Ed has literally received letters of commendation signed by Dunlop during his time in legacy at the 412th. So, admin, if you are listening, please subpoena Dunlop. And all of this goes deeper and again pairs with our themes today of departments hidden within departments. Two three-letter organizations share responsibility within AFTTE. AFTTE, Policy, Programs, and Resources Division, and AFTTEZ, the Special Programs Division. As you might expect, AFTTE, Special Programs Division, represents Air Force TN to the Special Programs Review Group, overseeing all Air Force special access programs surrounding test and evaluation. AFTTEZ also deals heavily with foreign material programs. For example, according to the headquarters air force mission directive 1-52, aft is responsible for quote providing leadership direction, policy, and resources to ensure DAFF, foreign material, and classified test programs meet documented warfighter requirements, end quotes. and another quote quote providing management and oversight of the life cycle process for foreign material acquisition and oversight of exploitation of foreign aerospace related weapon systems and components end quote. And finally, another quote regarding aft quote, "Directing foreign material program execution to satisfy needs of operations, acquisitions, TN, and scientific and technical intelligence communities in support of war fighter requirements." End quote. And there are so many more intriguing quotes I could say regarding az. Like everything in this subject, perhaps foreign material programs literally refers to UFOs. Or perhaps we have to choose to dig deeper. And I choose to dig. Policy programs and resources division aft under Air Force Test and Evaluation Acts as the T& policy focal point for all air and space force testing conducted by the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center, Aphotech. the Air Force Major Commands, MAGCOMs, Space Force Field Commands, and forward operating agencies. We of course will get to MAGCOMs, but what about Aphotech? The Air Force operational test and evaluation center quote is a direct reporting unit under US Air Force headquarters, the Pentagon, Arlington, Virginia. It is the Air Force Independent Test Agency responsible for testing under operationally realistic conditions. new systems being developed for Air Force and multi-service use. End quote. >> Since its inception in January 1974, the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center has been at the forefront of operational test and evaluation, playing a pivotal role in strengthening national defense and ensuring the Air Force is best equipped to accomplish its mission. Apotech's mission is both clear and compelling to test emerging capabilities in operationally relevant environments to provide critical data to both warfighters and national decision makers. Our unwavering commitment is to our primary customer, America's war fighter. Aphotch is dedicated to eliminating operational surprises, ensuring that when a weapon system is deployed in combat, it performs as expected. As independent evaluators and operational testers, our guiding question is, will it work in a contested environment? Our responsibility is to thoroughly assess weapon systems operationally, identifying both their strengths and weaknesses. Avotech is supposed to operate independently to maintain objectivity in operational training. But as is the case with quote unquote independent federally funded and research and development centers, there is no such thing as independence when dealing with waved unagnowledged special access programs. Aphotech is located at Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. Kirtland, of course, also houses Sandia National Labs, a DOE/NSA National Lab FFRDC. I have devoted 3 plus hours to investigating. Aphtech operates four major detachments outside of Sandia located at Eglund Air Force Base, Hill Air Force Base in the UTR, Edwards Air Force Base housing the 412 test wing and Nellis Air Force Base within the NTR. Seem familiar? Aphotch test teams conduct tests at these selected sites and collect, analyze, and evaluate the data as well as prepare formal reports. I strongly theorize elements of Aphotech likely support AFT operations on major range and test facility bases that deal with TN of technologies of unknown origin and reverse engineered airframes. Zooming out here, we have begun our analysis of UFO legacy program structure within the Air Force by analyzing the headquarters of the Air Force that operates in direct support to the Secretary of the Air Force. To summarize these past three sections, I confidently state that UFO legacy programs, at least the majority of the programs, do not operate without oversight. In fact, again, I theorize these programs operate within extremely strict yet strict oversight channels, reading in only directorates and compartments critical to operating legacy program missions. These being the retrieval, storage, exploitation, derivation, and test and evaluation of nonhuman technologies. This is why I thought it so pertinent to analyze the top level structure of the Air Force to determine who and what offices would likely have access and involvement in these programs. And again in summary within the half we investigated the SAF AQ aka the assistant secretary of the air force acquisition technology and logistics and three specific directorates and one component under SAF AQ SAF AQR aka science technology and engineering SAF AQX aka acquisition integration SAF AQL aka air force special programs and the RCO or rapid capabilities office. All three of these directorates under SAFQ deal with the deepest of deep and clandestine special access programs. And as I outlined earlier, I believe acquisition legacy program execution is conducted through the RCO to operate as efficiently and securely as possible with near limitless access to funds. In short, I believe highlevel acquisition compartments or directorates within not just the Air Force but the entire DoD/IC are where we must turn our magnifying glass to uncover legacy programs. We additionally investigated the administrative assistant secretary of the air force specifically SAF AH or sensitive activities and SAF AAZ security/ special programs oversight/info protection and even explored how director of sensitive activities SCES2 Russell E. Wiler or director security special programs oversight and info protection SCES2 William E. Mccclure may have been the SCS2 air force gatekeeper infamously labeled in the Christopher Melon signal exchange. Lastly, we discussed aft or test and evaluation under the air staff within the half. Here we discussed actual components of air force TN aft policy programs and resources division and aft special programs division. We connected aft as a whole to foreign material programs where one may infer foreign materials including materials of nonhuman origin. However, as we discussed, I find even more value in aft's management of specific TN activities across Air Force major range and test facility bases. We ultimately linked this AFTTE responsibility to Aphotech and numerous Air Force MRTFBS I have covered before on this channel. And these include the NTR, UTR, and Edwards 412 test wing. So again, in summary, SAF AQ, AFTE, and SAF AA, including AFA AAH and AFAZ are where I would recommend the current administration should search to find Air Force legacy programs that operate under the National Security Council. The United States Air Force Office of Special Investigations, defending the nation, serving justice, protecting the integrity of the Air Force, finding the truth. The men and women of Air Force OSI are reaching a new level of sophistication. We are a federal law enforcement agency that identifies, exploits, and neutralizes criminal, terrorist, and intelligence threats to the Air Force, Department of Defense, and the United States government. Our breath of mission is vast. From criminal investigations to counter intelligence, our special agents are on the front line at home and around the globe. Before we continue down the structure of the Air Force pyramid, I do think it imperative to stop and investigate the ever infamous Air Force Office of Special Investigations, often referred to as AFOSI or OSI. After all, we outlined numerous offices within the headquarters of the Air Force that I theorize engage with the UFO legacy portfolio. Sure, we have SAPs and USAPS waved and bigoted to keep legacy operations both highly secret and compartmentalized, but also free from congressional oversight. And we have the SAPCO or special access program central office and its former director, Don Dunlop, who also served within the Edwards 412 test wing as commander. And we have the director of the NPMS, one of the most critical little known positions in the entire country to arbitrate access to such programs. A fine security structure, sure, but what about active program protection, insider and outsider threat mitigation and enforcement of strict secrecy surrounding Air Force UFO use. When I say AFOSI, what comes to mind? Is it AFOSI silencing numerous witnesses in the days of Project Blue Book? Or perhaps you think of OSI counter intelligence special agent Rick Dodie, who was stationed out of Kirtland Air Force Base, an infamously engaged in psychological operations against one Paul Benowitz. I always find it intriguing Dodie now has seemingly turned a new leaf and is aligned with various disclosure initiatives, yet still finds himself in hot waters. Recently, Dodie actually claimed there were attempts for him and Luis Alzando to work together in a counter intelligence position. >> I was offered a job in 2019 by the United States Space Force where Louando worked to work with him in disinformation. And I said, "Not no, but hell no. I'll never do that again." Ultimately, I am intrigued by Dod's alleged new open kimono true testimony, especially the hour and a half interview he conducted with Steven Greer for the documentary Unagnowledged. And uh during my time there, my first few months there, I was briefed into a special access program involving the US government's uh investigation and contacts with extraterrestrial, the visitation of these extraterrestrials to to uh to Earth and the the Air Force's involvement with these with these uh extraterrestrials. >> What year did you first get ready for the project? >> I was read project into the project in the summer of 1979 and and and the briefing was it was a a special access program. I have a special security clearance to have access to it. And it was briefed I was briefed into it by an Air Force colonel uh from Washington who came down and briefed myself and a couple other people into this program. >> And do you remember? >> Yeah, the the it was the the initial um how do I say this because uh there's still some uh classifications involved in this I think. So, uh, it was, uh, the code name that I was briefed into it was Yankee Black. Uh, but that was the program's briefing. Wasn't necessarily the UFOs program. It was just how it was a security actually a security code for an access program. Yankee White was uh access to the to the White House and Yankee Black was the access that you would have to have to get into this program or right into the program. Take what we just heard here for example, Yankee Black as an access code into UFO programs. This interview was filmed between 2017 and 2019. And many years later, the Washington Post published a nonsensical and dubious article claiming any and all UFO whistleblowers had been tricked by an Air Force special access program meant to haze officers called Yankee Blue. If Yankee Blue is so real in a fake SAP, then there should be no trouble releasing the document, right? I mean, even people who have called themselves journalists claim to have this document, a document secured by special access controls. So, if they can have it, why can't we? Ultimately, Dodie has spoken about much of what we have talked here on my channel. However, due to his past counter intelligence efforts, I will not be taking into consideration DOD's testimonies. If anything, I lead towards Dodie performing program protection by proclaiming truths mixed in with misdirection, lies, and red herrings, aka classic disinformation techniques. But perhaps one day we will analyze Dodie and his claims and how they have progressed, changed, and stayed the same over the years. But let's take a step back and talk about AFOSI a little more and discuss why I'm including the Department of the Air Force's primary federal law enforcement agency that has a proven history of meddling within UFOs and UFO sightings within this project. The OSI quote provides professional investigative service to commanders of all Air Force activities. OSI identifies, investigates, and neutralizes criminal, terrorist, and espionage threats to Air Force and Department of Defense personnel and resources. The command focuses on five priorities. Develop and retain a force capable of meeting Air Force needs. Detect and provide early warnings of worldwide threats to the Air Force. Identify and resolve crimes that threatens Air Force readiness or good order and discipline. combat threats to information systems and technologies, detect and defeat fraud impacting force acquisitions and base level capabilities. Today, AFOSI consists of 2600 plus active duty, reserve, and civilian personnel, around 2,000 of which are federally credentialed special agents. AFOSI has eight field investigation regions, seven of which are actually aligned with Air Force Major Commands or MAGCOMs. Reference back to our Air Force structure chart and recall MAGCOMs exist as a significant air force organization subordinate to the headquarters of the Air Force. Now, this may perfectly well be coincidence, but just bear with me for a moment. Recall back to earlier in this video in my Sandia project to the testimony of former New Mexico State Rep. J. Andrew Kner. Kner would bravely conduct numerous interviews with firstirhand legacy program personnel between 1994 and 1995 and actually share his findings with select individuals such as Congressman Steven Schiff, who ultimately launched an intriguing investigation into Roswell. Sources would disclose to Kner that several classified presidential executive orders in July of 1948 would create the early skeleton of legacy programs. These directives would seek custody of recovered discs given to the Atomic Energy Commission and their government-owned contractor operated national labs like Sandia officially established in 49. I'm actually in firm solidarity with this point in particular and presented such findings as an argument for around 3 hours in my Sandia project. Indeed, I am in complete agreement with the overwhelming majority of Knisser's disclosures as I have come to understand similar truths. Now, I do differ slightly in understanding President Eisenhower may have been a bit more consequential in establishing the UFO Legacy Program framework, but Truman indeed did lay such foundations. According to Kissner, early programs saw the National Security Council operate as overall program coordinator with early support from the Naval Research Lab, Vanavar Bush's Research and Development Board, and Air Force Systems Command, a former Air Force Major Command, seeing as according to Knisser, such a framework was established by classified presidential executive order in July of 1948. I do find it intriguing. AFOSI was established in 1948 and fully morphed into an operational agency by August of 1948. Is this a coincidence here? Well, perhaps. But I do find these lineups of dates quite intriguing. Indeed, it was Air Force Chief of Staff Hoy Vandenberg that signed General Order number 29 on 15 July 1948 that actually empowered OSI to engage in counterintelligence activities. Vandenberg was also an original alleged member of the enigmatic and infamous Majestic 12. Another interesting parallel here. And of course, in no way, shape or form am I claiming AFOSI exists as a program protection and federal enforcement agency behind Air Force UFO programs. No, I am claiming here a specialized office within OSI does this. So, as we discussed, AFOSI operates eight field investigation units, seven of which are aligned with Air Force Major Commands, and OSI consists of over 230 acknowledged sites worldwide. AFOSI region 7, the only region not aligned with the MAGCOM, operates with the mission to quote, provide counter intelligence and security program management for special access programs under the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force end. Indeed, here to kickstart our investigation, AFOSI gets even more specialized in relation to working with sensitive Air Force SAPs. OSI is comprised of several specialized investigation training or support units and these include the office of procurement fraud, four support squadron, air force special investigations academy, investigations, collections operations nexus center, and here the office of special projects aka PJ. AFOSIPJ is the premier target for our investigation into Air Force UFO Legacy Program security. The Office of Special Projects, aka PJ, as I will refer to it from here on out, can be labeled as a simple phrase we hear all the time in regards to UFO programs. Quote, PJ, critical to national security. End quote. According to the AFOSI website, quote, PJ's most critical mission is preserving the most classified and sight sensitive technologies. To fulfill that mission, PJ agents are trained and equipped to secure, recover, and protect these technologies." End quote. PJ operates to deliver robust and flexible multidiscipline security and investigative services to special access programs or SAPs. PJ is responsible for performing program security, inspection, cyber security, investigative, and counterintelligence functions for all air and space force SAPs. Whether it be security and protection, counter intelligence, oversight, investigation, support, etc. PJ is the critical office that protects and secures critical and classified sensitive air force technologies and use. AFOSI has previously been attached to protect top secret R&D of some of the US's most innovative and secretive airframes. And these include Tacit Blue, the B2 Spirit Bomber, B21 Raider, and F17A Nighthawk. similar to the DARPA security and intelligence directorate aka DARPA SID in the DOE's office of intelligence and counter intelligence aka OICI within my UFO legacy program framework serving as a proverbial limestone casing to protect the pyramid from the elements or in real life insider and outsider threat protection. I believe with the utmost conviction, Air Force UFO Legacy Program SAPS and USAPS are safeguarded by the men and women within AFOSIPJ. Indeed, let's just take a look at some of the 31 acknowledged to AFOSIPJ locations across the continental United States. Special Projects maintains a permanent presence at the Pentagon, Crystal City, Virginia, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, Palmdale, California, Elsagando, California, Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, Las Vegas, Nevada, Hill Air Force Base, Utah, Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico, and the Naval Support Activity Dogrren. Let's break all of these down as every single location listed has been directly mentioned in my projects of prior. Crystal City here features eight of 10 of the US's top defense contractors and the small neighborhood is where roughly 2/3 of federal contracts are awarded by value. The location holds primary offices held by Northrup Grumman, Loheed Martin, Boeing, Rathon, General Dynamics, L3, Aerogjet Rocketine, and more. All contractors I am highly confident engage with UFO programs. The neighborhood of Crystal City also holds or is in close proximity to numerous FFRDC's I believe are up to their eyeballs in UFO programs and these include the Center for Naval Analyses, Institute for Defense Analyses, Aerospace Corporation, Rand Homeland Security Operations Analysis Center and more. And additionally, Crystal City is home to myriad DoD research agencies, including DARPA, the Office of Naval Research, and Air Force Office of Scientific Research. As one former SAP security specialist who operated within legacy programs told me, quote, "The answers to everything you are looking for lie in Crystal City." End quote. Elsagundo, California serves as a major hub for aerospace and defense with large institutions focused on top secret RDT&E from Boeing, Northrup Grumman, Rathon, Loheed Martin, and the Aerospace Corporation. Wright Patterson is easily the most infamous air force base relating to UFO lore with stories of deep underground military bases, recovered biologics, and stored nonhuman craft. I of course will take a bit of a different approach according to our investigation today and mark outright Patterson as housing major command air force material command. I believe AFMC here holds many of the keys for us to analyze UFO reverse engineering and material exploitation programs and of course stay tuned for that. Las Vegas, Nevada, of course, borders the NTRMRTFB, housing Nellis Air Force Base, Area 51, Area 51 adjacent sites like the Enigmatic S4, Tonipa Test Range, Area 6, etc. Again, most top secret sites across the NTR are occupied by the Edwards 412th test wing. In my opinion, of course, the most critical wing and MRTFB in all of Air Force legacy programs. In a similar manner, Hill Air Force Base resides in the Utah test and training range and Dougway proving ground aka Area 52. Hill Air Force Base itself is home to Air Force Material Commands Ogden Air Logistics Complex, which is the worldwide manager for a wide range of aircraft, engines, missiles, software, avionics, and accessories components. I believe Hill Air Force Base likely engages in joint Air Force and Army UFO Legacy Program operations across Dougway proving ground housed within the UTR and WDTC or West Desert Test Center. Kirtland Air Force Base is home to the Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center, Aphotech, which as we discussed earlier works closely with the half compartment Air Force Test and Evaluation. Kirtland also shares a home with Sandia National Labs. Again, Sandia is alongside MITER the most critical FFRDC to UFO legacy program operations in my opinion. NSF Dogrren or Naval Support Facility Dogg is an interesting one here. Why would AFOSIPJ be at a naval support facility? Do is home to a Naval Surface Warfare Center or NSWC? I believe that NSWC Dolrren alongside NSWC Crane which infamously allegedly houses the off-world technologies division alongside the Naval Undersea Warfare Center or Newick Keyport are all critical pillars in naval UFO retrieval and reverse engineering missions. Indeed, I believe these naval facilities are all critical to the tip of the spear pax river. Apparently, AFOSI PJ operates critical space surveillance and tracking missions outside of Dogrren here. And lastly, Palmdale, California. Palmdale resides within the Antelopee Valley. I have extensively provided theories that Antelopee Valley, sometimes referred to as the aerospace valley, is the backbone of UFO RDT& programs, providing test ranges, infrastructure, scientists, contractors, FFRDC's, personnel, air force wings, etc., etc., etc. towards the RDini of alien reproduction vehicles and derivative technologies. I have also published on Antelope Valley here housing access to a complex network of deep underground military bases. I have theorized this network operates largely under Edward's Air Force Base in China Lake and connects to Lockheed's infamous Helenale radar cross-section range and Northrup's infamous Tahone radar cross-section range. Antelope Valley is so incredibly interesting and connects to so much of my work. I highly recommend checking out my projects on Loheed Martin or Dums to learn more. Antelopee Valley and the former Norton Air Force Base even connects to one of my all-time favorite ARV cases, the 1988 Norton Air Force Base air show, Flux Liners. Most pertinent to today is likely Palmdale's proximity to Edwards Air Force Base where Ed states the Edwards 412 test wing under the Air Force Test Center AFTC itself under MAGCOM Air Force Material Command AFMC tests and evaluates aerospace vehicles derived from technical vehicles operated by non-human intelligence. Palmdale is also crucial because of Air Force Plant 42. Plant 42 is one of four Air Force plants situated throughout the United States and managed by the acquisition environment and industrial facilities division at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Plant 42 is known as a Goko institution governmentowned contractor operated. This is an ideal management structure as we've observed with FFRDC's, one of the critical layers of my UFO legacy program pyramid that I say serves as the missing link between US DoD/IC elements and defense industrialbased prime contractors. Plant 42 provides exclusive access to a unique government operated airfield complex to but just three defense contractors. And I bet you can guess who these are. Yeah, Boeing, Loheed Martin, and Northrup Grumman. Indeed, on this go-k complex, these three contractors work closely with pilots from the Edwards Air Force Test C Center's premier test pilot school. Again, think back to the claims of Ed, who claimed pilots of ARV hail from the prestigious TPS. Here, such a sentiment was shared by Air Force Master Sergeant Edgar Fuche, who disclosed his knowledge of the TR3B alien reproduction vehicle. My name is Edgar Rashal Fuche. I'm here to speak about secret government technology reverse engineering of alien artifacts. The circular plasma field accelerator ring called the magnetic field disruptor surrounds a rotatable crew compartment. It's far ahead of anything you've ever imagined as far as technology. Sandia and Livermore Laboratories developed a reverse engineered MFD and I believe the government will go at any lengths to protect this technology. Fuchcher would state the then Northrup Corporation, Lockheed Corporation, and Boeing were critical defense contractors involved with R&D of the TR3B. And pilots of TR3B hailed from both the Naval Test Pilot School at Pax River and the Air Force Flight Test Center, AFTTC, which would become the AFTC's test pilot school out of Edwards. Fuchche would also state many TR3B were flown or operated out of Edwards itself. >> One night, a longtime friend of mine and I were standing on top of the Fairchild A10 hanger at Edwards Air Force Base. It was 2:00 a.m. in a perfectly clear night with millions of stars visible to the naked eye. This was a very common night at Edwards. I noticed a group of stars we were looking at was seem to be shifting in color and at the time I can name quite a few constellations. I just taken a astrology course and uh definitely knew what the Big Dipper was. I made a C and I made a C in that course I think or B. So I pointed out to my friend that the three stars near the Big Dipper in triangular formation were not supposed to be there. We watched as the strobing stars shifted in color to from a reddish yellow I'm excuse from a bright blue to a reddish yellow. After a period of about 20 minutes, we could tell that the objects weren't stars because they were getting larger. This was somewhat unnerving. It was further unnerving when the space in between the stars started blocking out the stars in the background. We decided it probably was a top secret Air Force vehicle of some type. Still, we weren't sure. Uh, at the time, I didn't believe in UFOs. That's the honest truth. >> Many criticized Fuché for his lack of evidence, and I get it here. However, it is statements like these regarding the R&D management agencies and involve contractors of TR3B that give me pause to reflect on Fuché's claims regarding this triangular airframe with reverse engineered propulsion systems from Sandia and Lawrence Liverour. Seeing as plant 42 is not only home to Boeing, Loheed Martin and Northrup Grumman, but also their Loheed skunk works, Boeing Phantom Works, and Northrup's advanced technology development center, which are these contractors most secretive compartments that deal with top secret aircraft, special access programs, and carveout contracts. It makes complete sense that AFOSIPJ would have a permanent station here, especially if, like I am confident in, Palmdale is critical to US UFO legacy program RDT&f infrastructure. Without exaggeration, throughout this video so far, I have made myriad mentions to a possible UFO legacy program gatekeeper that I do indeed fear. I consider it a risk. speaking about this individual. But alas, we must be the change we want to see in this topic. This alleged gatekeeper and an individual I would consider to be a boogeyman. Well, this would be one Mr. Terry Phillips, former executive director of OSI, Office of Special Projects, aka AFOSIPJ. Mr. Phillips enjoyed a remarkable career within federal service and enjoys an equally prestigious career within industry today. Terry Phillips began his career as an Air Force officer. Around 1997, Phillips became a special agent for the OSI and by 2001 operated as program security officer/ special agent for AFOSIPJ. at this position with Air Combat Command Matchcom HQ, Philillips quote protected special access programs for the combat air force end quote. By just 2006, Phillips achieved the position of deputy director within AFOSI, directing counter intelligence and investigative operations supporting Air Force Mobility Command, which is a MAGCOM. Phillips would eventually transition to director of counter intelligence within AFOSI from 2012 to 2015 where by 2016 Philillips operated as deputy director for specifically AFOSI PJ. And here is where things get really interesting. From December 2016 to December of 2021, Philip served as the outright Air Force SAP security director. Within this role, Phillips led investigative and counter intelligence strategy and operations to protect Air Force and Space Force SAPS. Within this role, Phillips also served as executive director of AFOSI Special Projects, PJ. And it is worth noting in these two roles as executive director, Office of Special Projects, PJ, and United States Air Force and Space Force Special Access Program Security Director. Philillips was not only responsible for all Air Force and Space Force SAPS, but also all non-air force SAPs where the Air Force had been assigned responsibility. On 6th August 2020, Philillips was selected for senior executive service tier 1, the equivalent to a brigadier general or one-star admiral. Phillips was the first executive director of PJ to hold the rank of SCES1. Indeed, according to an extremely obscure podcast featuring Philillips titled, quote, "OSI Today, my OSI Journey 16" end quote, Phillips was incredibly proud, specifically of his tech protection capabilities as SCES1. Now, you were asked about at the time your reaction to the news of being elevated to the SCES as the executive director, and the first word out of your mouth, sir, was pride. The one word, pride. And you said you were proud that this appointment elevates all of OSI and recognizes the value of our technology protection mission. And I would assume that uh since the time you were appointed uh that pride has not waned one bit. >> Uh Wayne, it's um my pride has grown uh 25fold. Um abs it's absolutely uh amazing um to to see the mission that we do in OSI. Um, and and for me getting to be involved with our special projects mission every day is just it's just very special to be a be able to see that accomplished in the field at the very edge of our Air Force operations. It's it's amazing. >> I think back to David Grush's sworn testimony before Congress in the summer of 2023. Like most of what Grush says, if we listen, perhaps there are some clues here we can detect. >> So, who gets to decide this in your opinion in the past? Uh it's a group of career uh senior executive officials. >> Okay. Are they government officials? >> Both in and out >> do what? >> Both in and out of government. And that's about as far as All right. Well, that's it leads to my next question. >> As I said earlier with RCO, senior executive officials is more of a generic term comprising agency heads, cabinet secretaries, deputy secretaries, senior executive service, etc. And let me just say this here. I strongly suspect the reprisals, academic terrorism, and threats to his career and safety David Grush experienced before submitting his whistleblower complaints to Thomas Mannheim under the intelligence community inspector general, as well as reprisals leveraged at other heroic whistleblowers like Dylan Borland. Partially, if not fully, came from offices like the DARPA SID security and intelligence directorate and AFOSIPJ. Grush here would have indeed been considered an insider or outsider threat by such SAP security directors. Seen as David Grush embarked on a quest to uncover UFO legacy programs hidden beneath the deepest layers of bigoted waved USAPs in the US black budget. I reckon if and when Grush stumbled upon the US Air Force legacy program portfolio or Air Force's involvement in UFO legacy programs hidden within offices like AFTTE, SAF, AAH and SAF AQ involving MAGCOMs like AFMC and its AFRL and AFTC Air Force MRTFBs such as the 412 Test Wing, NTR and UTR. The executive director of AFOSIPJ and Air Force SAP security director Terry Phillips would have swarmed to attempt to stop David Grush and perhaps just perhaps launched numerous reprisals against this American hero. Perhaps Phillips and AFOSIPJ leveraged reprisals at other whistleblowers or prospective whistleblowers and had some help. I know of several non-public UFO legacy program firsthanders who faced harassment from specifically the FBI between 2021 and today. One such individual worked directly within UFO RDT&E under the US Air Force. Indeed, quite recently in December of 2025, Jeff Nusatelli went on that UFO podcast and discussed elements of the FBI attempting to infiltrate UFO podcast circles. the the Fed has actively infiltrated the podcasting space. I put this out publicly a few months ago. Uh Kurt Jai Mongle, who I'm a fan of, put a tweet out a few months ago and said, "Hey, what's going on in UFO world and I said, "Here's what's going on. The FBI is infiltrating the podcast space." And you're going to see that start to play out. And I think that is going to play out. And you're going to because of that initiative and other initiatives, you're going to see heroes fall. >> The FBI possibly targeting whistleblowers are taking a vested interest in UFO podcasts may seem bizarre, but I think there is a very clear connection here. In late 1979, according to OSI's own website, PJ introduced an innovative new approach to help protect quote acknowledged black programs end. This innovative technique was to insert a small cadre of FBI personnel into the Air Force's special access program efforts. AFOSIPJ and the FBI developed the Guardian Angel program to include small groups of FBI personnel assigned to Air Force special access programs. Approximately eight FBI agents in Los Angeles and select personnel at FBI headquarters in Washington DC were briefed into many of the most critical Air Force SAPs. While of course Guardian Angel under AFOSIPJ and FBI absolutely protected many conventional saps here like arresting Thomas Patrick Kavanaaugh a North B2 engineer who attempted to sell classified stealth technology. I do find it very intriguing. Guardian Angel would be located near the two most critical areas in the entire continental United States in my opinion for UFO programs. So with this, the question must be asked. These non-public legacy firsthanders I have spoken about who have claimed to have been harassed by the FBI. Was this FBI element attached to AFOSIPJ under the Guardian Angel or a similar continuation program? In fact, I believe it is well worth the current administration's time to investigate if PJ is actively operating against whistleblowers. SCES1 Air Force app security director and executive director of OSI Office of Special Projects, Terry Phillips. I hope you didn't think we'd stop there. Referencing back to the OSI Today podcast Philillips appeared on shortly before his retirement, Phillips took pride in accomplishing the art of the impossible during his tenure at OSI. >> Now, at the top of the the uh broadcast, we mentioned that uh this is the eve of your uh retirement from OSI. And in your farewell email earlier today to the PJ team, uh you said something very interesting, and I was hoping you can maybe elaborate on that just a bit. You said, quote, "We define the art of the possible." What exactly did you mean by that, sir? >> Great. I'm I'm glad you picked up on that. Is um a a security organization um is is known for saying to known to say no. And um and I've been in in PJ um back I joined PJ back in 2001 uh for a short stint and and it was it's very very easy to say no um to industry to government to a to a pilot who's flying. Um the the art of the possible is not to just say not to say no but to say you can do it if we add these add this adds this mitigation. >> Can we can we build a classified airplane and in a hanger? >> The the answer is it doesn't have sound attenuation. It it doesn't um it there's some exposure. Uh there may be some emissions about this. Um, how do we protect all the entry points? Well, so it's easy to just say no, you can't build in a hanger, but where are you going to build where are you going to build an airplane? >> So, you have to say yes is you can do that, but we need to add some blinds on the windows. We need to add some insulation for sound attenuation. That is the art of the possible now. And then that and then it becomes a discussion. So the art of the possible is a discussion that that tells you what how to get to yes and in PJ we're known for that. Um we're we're the security organization that is known for doing that. We understand the risk. We understand uh the threats and we understand uh what the Air Force has for funding and availability and time to be able to develop a platform. And then we enter a risk discussion with the program executive officer or the program manager on how to get to yes. And so that is the art of the possible. >> Immediately upon his retirement from PJ, Terry Phillips was appointed as the senior vice president and chief security officer at LOS. Quote, Terry has managed some of the Department of Defense's most sensitive capabilities, technologies, and operations, and we're thrilled to welcome him to Los. his decades of experience will be instrumental as we look to bolster our corporate global security strategy. End quote. Loss an American defense aviation information technology and biomedical research company is currently known as the defense industry's largest IT services provider with exclusive extensive contracts with the US Department of Defense and Intelligence community. If Lato sounds familiar to you, well, this is because in 2013, Lato spun out of parent company Science Applications International Corporation, SIC. And in 2016, LOS merged with Loheed Martin's IT sector. SIC has featured as a target for my investigations. SIC here aka NSA West has shown an incredibly fascinating trail of black budget monies, exotic projects, work on psychic phenomena, and also served as a home for myriad gatekeepers. And in my opinion, SIC operates the off-world technologies division housed under the Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane. I highly recommend watching my SEIC project, but one of the primary pieces of that investigation was addressing individuals I believed served highlevel positions within UFO legacy programs whilst in the DoD/IC, who then went on to trade in their stars and stripes for a suit at SIC. What I mean to say is I believe these individuals exited federal service to continue work on UFO legacy programs on the contractor's side. Such sic individuals include Admiral Bobby Ray Inman, the Honorable John M. Deutsch, Admiral William F. Rayborn, Donald Kerr, and more. Oh yeah, and if we're adhering to today's investigation that the SAF AQ, aka the assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition technology and logistics and SAFQ's directorates, SAF AQL, SAF AQX, and SAQR are instrumental to UFO legacy program operations. Remember that former SAF AAQ head Lawrence J. Delaney served as deputy sector manager for military sciences and information systems sector and then as manager of its information system group for sic. I say all this because I believe Terry Phillips engaged in a similar shift from executive director of PJ and Air Force SAP security director onto LOS. But LOS, in my opinion, is just a drop in the pond to what came next for Phillips. From 2013 to present, Phillips has served as vice president for security and chief security officer for none other than Northrup Grumman. Building aircraft the likes of which the world has never seen. This is what we do. That's the value of performance. Northrup Grown. Northrup needs no introduction here. And now is when I encourage folks to pay attention to what I say regarding the select few in defense industrialbased primes or defense contractors read into UFO legacy program operations. I believe most personnel within contractors are subject to extreme compartmentalization and are not privy to what they are working on or possess just a tiny piece of the knowledge pie. A good conceptual example here is Bob Lazar claiming program scientists and technicians under EG&G at Area 51S4 could not communicate cross compartments. In Bob's words, Bob allegedly worked on the reactor and propulsion system, but had zero ability to contact teams studying metallurgy, chemistry concepts, etc. So, who do I say has read into the programs at a corporate level? And again, I strongly recommend you listen to me here. This would include SAP security directors and corporate directors for special programs like none other than Mr. Terry Phillips of Northrup Grumman. Before we move on though, I have detailed a thesis that Terry Phillips is a boogeyman of UFO legacy program gatekeepers, illustrating that in his SCES1 position with an AFOSIPJ and Air Force SAPS, Philillips likely engaged in aggressive legacy program protection as well as insider and outsider threat mitigation, possibly with his FBI chums under the Guardian Angel program. Well, this here is the cherry on top. We actually have verifiable instances of Phillips being connected to UFOs. And let's go ahead and thank Foya ace John Greenwald for this one. On 15 July 2025, Greenwald published an article on the Black Vault titled, quote, "The DoD Inspector General's evaluation of the DoD's actions regarding unidentified aerial phenomena." End quote. Greenwald sought records pertaining to project number D2021-devsn-116.0000. A department of defense office of inspector general project aimed at evaluating how the DoD has managed reports and investigations relating to UAPs. One name came up numerous times regarding this project in a foyer response dated 6th February 2025. That name took part in classified conversations during the inspector general's UAP evaluation. And that name is Terry Phillips. Amongst the endless redactions, Phillips is all over these documents alongside former AFOSI commander, Brigadier General Terry Bullard as participating in numerous, and I mean numerous, classified UFO conversations with the DoD. Indeed, Phillips was even positioned as a subject matter expert on UFOs with the DoD deputy inspector general excitedly sharing redacted nuggets of information given by Phillips in a meeting General Bullard was unable to attend that took place on Thursday 4 March 2021. Phillips again appeared in a relevant foyer drop dated 15th July 2025. This time Phillips as executive director of PJ appeared alongside USD ANS and USD INS SAPCO air force security/ special programs oversight/info protection aka safaz army sapos director of the navy special programs division and more extremely senior positions quite intriguing Philillips would be considered as a UFO point of contact amongst these extremely highlevel DoD position positions, is it not? But after all, I think Phillips perfectly fits the bill as a senior UFO POC or point of contact and subject matter expert to the DoD IG. As both in federal service and in his corporate roles, I believe Terry Phillips is a gatekeeper of UFO legacy program operations. I prompt this lining of questioning for the administration to ask Phillips, and I'll just go ahead and quote myself here. Quote, "Mr. Phillips, during your tenure as director of OSIPJ and Air Force Special Access Program Security Director, did you actively engage in reprisals against UFO whistleblowers? Did you, alongside the PJ Cadre, leverage administrative terrorism, loss of pension/benefits, and threats to life and well-being against whistleblowers?" End quotes. And real fast before we move on, I would like to publicly call out Philip's replacement as both PJ director and Air Force SAP director. Additionally, a member of SCES, meet Special Agent Liam Russ. Not much here regarding Russ and we've already spent so much time on PJ, but I would implore the administration to leverage the same questions regarding whistleblowers against Lee M. Russ. Now that we have exhaustively analyzed the headquarters of the Air Force and connected specific compartments to UFO legacy programs, as well as studied the Air Force's formidable SAP security structure in AFOSIPJ, I think it now prudent we recall our Air Force organizational structure pyramid and move below half to the 10 MAGCOMs in existence. Major commands or MAGCOMs as we will continue to call them from here on out serve as major air force subdivisions subordinate to the half specializing in management of forces all to asssure air force assets are organized trained and equipped. Matchcoms are typically commanded by a three to fourstar general and these organizations are based on functionality and geography. The current Air Force Matchcoms of today include Air Education and Training Command, Air Force Global Strike Command, Air Force Reserve Command, Air Mobility Command, Pacific Air Forces, United States Air Forces in Europe and Africa, Air Force Special Operations Command, Air Combat Command, and Air Force Material Command. Thematically like our entire investigation today, I don't believe every single Air Force MCCOM is involved with clandestine UFO projects. Indeed, I think only MCCOMs that have strict expertise in required areas feature subcomponents, personnel, and pieces read onto the bigot list of Tuo or Technology of Unknown Origins programs. I personally suspect at least four matchcoms have involved elements in legacy programs. Two of which I will only briefly mention. One of which we will spend a few minutes on and the last of which we will study for the entirety of the remainder of this section. And these four include Air Combat Command, Air Mobility Command, Air Force Special Operations Command, and the most critical target in my opinion, Air Force Material Command. Air Mobility Command quote provides global air mobility through airlift and aerial refueling for all of the United States armed forces. End quote. I believe it is likely AMC here has transported recovered or downed UFOs via C130s or C5 galaxies in the past, but again I only wanted to talk about it briefly. In a similar vein, Air Combat Command operates to quote support the global implementation of national security strategy. ACC operates fighters, reconnaissance, battle management, and electronic combat aircraft end quote. As we mentioned earlier, Air Combat Command is stationed out of Langley Air Force Base. recalling the testimony of Dylan Borland observing a triangular airframe with black metallic flight paint and what seemed to be an electrooptic cloaking system over the NASA hanger at Langley. Recall how Borland stated he knew specifically the technology featured on or in the craft was not ours. I think it a reasonable hypothesis Borland observed air combat command testing either an alien reproduction vehicle or a man-made triangular airframe employing a derivative cloaking system undergoing test flights by elements of air combat command. Indeed, I expanded on this argument quite a bit in my NRO video. So, if you want to hear more on that, go listen in. Air Force Special Operations Command of course provides Air Force soft or special forces units to SOCOM or Special Operations Command. SOCOM's joint component command JOCK or Joint Special Operations Command has time and time again been labeled as the Direct Action and Boots on the ground military force for UFO crash retrieval operations. J-AC consists of America's tier 1 units, the greatest special forces units in the entire world. JOC includes US Army Delta, Navy Seal Team 6, aka Devgroup, the Army Intelligence Support Activity, aka ISA, the Army Ranger Regimental Reconnaissance Company, aka RRC, and the Air Force's 24th STS or Special Tactics Squadron. I cannot stress enough the prestige of tier 1 units and their helicopter transport chauffeurs from the army. The 160th sore or special operations aviation regiment aka the nightstalkers who by the way I believe the 160th sore first battalion often engages with UFO crash retrievals especially for troop and possibly craft transport in CH47s or MH47 helicopters. J-AC units conduct the most highly classified, sensitive, and dangerous operations of any unit within the entire US military. The air force's component of JOCK, the 24th STS include par rescue men, combat controllers, special reconnaissance, and tactical air control party personnel. 24th STS personnel are trained to conduct classified and clandestine missions including direct action, counterterrorism, counterinsurgency, hostage rescue, and special reconnaissance. Recently in that project on the NRO I just mentioned, I outlined a comprehensive thesis on select parallel tier 1 units existing under their own umbrella authority who operate as the boots on ground and direct action component of clandestine teams dedicated to the retrieval of crashed, downed, or found UFOs worldwide. In the interest of time, I won't rehash that argument, but I strongly recommend viewing that video as I also covered an intriguing anonymous whistleblower testimony of a 24th STS veteran who claimed his troop chief operated within such UFO retrieval teams and even recovered a bizarre egg-shaped craft. Finally, and boy am I excited here, we get to the illustrious Air Force Material Command. The spirit of technological innovation, ingenuity, and patriotism lives on in Air Force Material Command as we deliver solutions to America's war fighters. Today, aircraft can complete missions across the globe without a pilot ever leaving US soil. They have built-in systems that can detect a target, abort a mission, and save pilots lives. Simply put, we changed the nature of war. And behind every platform, innovation, and Air Force vision of the future is an AFMC airman. Which means the only thing AFMC has to deal with is everything. We built the Air Force of today and we are changing the nature of warfare for tomorrow. From ground to space to human warfighter and everything in between. We impact the entire life cycle of every Air Force system. New ideas born of basic laboratory research, technology development in areas such as artificial intelligence, 3D printing, quantum science, and more. We prototype and experiment. We test and field advanced Air Force systems. We support supply chain and maintenance of both the new and aging aircraft and systems our fellow airmen need to complete their missions. Whether you're talking about 60-year-old B-52 bombers, cuttingedge software, next generation warf fighting capabilities, our nuclear arsenal, or the Air Force uniform of the future, AFMC is where our Air Force comes for solutions. Beams to bullets, roads to commod, razors to lasers. Our air force depends on us to preserve our heritage and modernize for the future. We are command of innovators, an extreme combination of dreamers and doers. Necessity is the mother of invention. But we also have to look at what the necessities will be decades from now. We've been turning imagination into reality for years. We were there for the creation of the parachute, the computer mouse, and GPS. We push limits on hypersonics. We train astronauts. The cutting edge base of the future. We're building it. Air Force Material Command or AFMC is the Air Force's largest MAGCOM in terms of funding, commanding a budget portfolio of $82.9 billion in the fiscal year of 2025 alone. This budget is divided into several major categories including AFMC operations and maintenance, unfunded requirement, working capital fund, centralized asset management, contracting, small businesses, and installation and mission support center. Headquartered out of the infamous Wright Patterson Air Force Base, AFMC conducts research, development, test, and evaluation, and provides acquisition, management services, and logistics support necessary to keep Air Force weapon systems ready for war. And already, I wager some buzzwords are standing out from our extensive investigation today, including R&D, test evaluation, together as RDT&E, and acquisition. AFMC's operational mission is quote powering the world's greatest air force. AFMC develops, delivers, supports, and sustains warinning capabilities. AFMC delivers war-winning expeditionary capabilities to the war fighter through development and transition of technology, professional acquisition management, exacting test and evaluation, and worldclass sustainment of all air force weapon systems from creation to disposal. AFMC provides the workforce and infrastructure necessary to ensure the United States maintains the world's most respected air force. End quotes. The AFMC mission impacts everything the Air Force does. Our mission is to develop, deliver, support, and sustain war-winning capabilities for our war fighters. That means we investigate and develop new technology, make that technology work for the war fighter, buy it, maintain it, and make sure it continues to work through upgrades and maintenance. We do this to make sure our air force continues to be the most lethal air, space, and cyber force the world has ever known. AFMC is split up into several core mission areas and six centers. Discovery and development under the Air Force Research Lab out of Wright Patterson, Ohio. Test and evaluation out of the Air Force Test Center at Edwards Air Force Base, California. Life cycle management under the Air Force Life Cycle Management Center out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio. Sustainment and Logistics under the Air Force Sustainment Center out of Tinker Air Force Base, Oklahoma. Installation and mission support under the Air Force Installation and Mission Support Center out of Joint Base San Antonio, Texas. And finally, nuclear systems management under Air Force Weapons Center out of Kirtland Air Force Base, New Mexico. I want to take an extended visit here into the Air Force Test Center and Air Force Research Lab under AFMC. If you are wondering why I haven't spent too much time on Wright Patterson as a whole here, Wright Pat has been a frequent subject of mine in many of my prior videos. These include claims of recovered biologics and recovered technical vehicles being housed under the legendary Air Force base. As this video is already so long, I don't wish to tread too much on old ground. And since I don't have too much to add regarding right, I don't care to analyze the Air Force base too much. But the Air Force Test Center, AFTC, formerly known as the Air Force Flight Test Center, AFTTC, out of Edwards Air Force Base under Air Force Material Command, is one of the most critical institutions to our entire investigation today. AFTC quote conducts developmental and follow-on testing and evaluation of manned and unmanned aircraft and related avionics, flight control, munitions, and weapon systems. It has flight tested every aircraft in the Army Air Forces and the Air Force's inventory since World War II. AFTC also operates the Air Force Test Pilot School, where the Air Force's top pilots, navigators, and engineers learn how to conduct flight tests and generate the data needed to carry out test missions." End quotes. And if we've already discussed all day today, who enforces the AFTC out of Edward's Air Force Base? Well, this is of course the Edwards 412 test wing MRTFB which quote plans, conducts, analyzes and reports on all flight and ground testing of aircraft, weapon system, software and components as well as modeling and simulation for the Air Force. There are three core components for this mission. Flying operations, maintenance and engineering end quote. Recall again witness Ed, a retired Air Force officer. Ed claimed whilst within the Air Force test center at the Edwards 412 test wing at Edwards Air Force Base, Ed literally served firsthand on a T& program focused on alien reproduction vehicles or derivative technologies. These airframes were both manned and unmanned, and the pilots of these manned reverse engineered technical vehicles hailed from the Edwards Test Pilot School. Additionally, recall how Ed's work here was conducted under AFTTE or Air Force Test and Evaluation within the HAF, which we discussed at length earlier. What I'm about to say here, I consider crucial, and I implore you to listen, even though you're about to hear a slew of acronyms, and I'm sorry for that. There's just no way around it. I cannot stress how critical the Edwards 412th MRTFB, the AFTC, the TPS, AFT&E, and thus AFMC is to our investigation. I strongly believe with extreme conviction UFO legacy programs within the Air Force utilize the AFTC, TPS, and AFL, which we will touch on soon, under AFMC, to reverse engineer, exploit, and adapt nonhuman aircraft and aerospace vehicles for human use. This program harnesses MRTFBs like the Edwards 412 test wing, UTR and NTR rolled under what we could call Western Ranges for test and evaluation work on this program and sees critical R&D work from Antelopee Valley contractors, especially from Boeing, Northrup Grman and Loheed Martin hailing from Air Force plant 42. This is my entire thesis of UFO RDT&E out of Antelopee Valley. I discuss so very much. Even if you discount the entire rest of this project, please please understand this thesis. AFMC, Edwards 412 Test Wing, NTR, UTR, the Aerospace Valley, AFTC, TPS, and AFMC are the focal point of actual active air force legacy program reverse engineering operations. I refer to this program or programs that focus on the T& of recovered exotic nonhuman vehicles as the hidden wing. So again, if you discount the entirety of this video, all 3 hours of it, please remember what I've discussed here about this massive TN project I call the hidden wing. I also do want to talk about the air force research lab here which operates as quote the primary scientific research and development center for the department of the air force. AFRL plays an integral role in leading the discovery, development and integration of affordable warfighting technologies for our air, space and cyerspace force. End quote. While we investigate, just remember AFRL and SAFQ under the half, which we labeled as a critical admin level position in UFO programs, work extremely closely on science and technology projects. AFRL is split up into two types of directorates, technology and functional. Functional directorates provide specialized support, strategic direction, and oversight of operations and business research, development, and innovation functions of AFL. Technology directorates focus on development and innovation and are separated by technological capabilities. I am personally very intrigued by AFRL's directed energy and space vehicles directorates located on Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Recall that Kirtland shares space with Sandia National Labs which in my opinion is the premier DOE/NSA National Lab FFRDC engaged with UFO programs. I am additionally intrigued in the aerospace systems AFRL directorate housed at none other than Edwards Air Force Base. I have actually talked about AFL's presence on Haststak but at Edwards before, specifically in my dumb video where I discussed AFRL and Haststack but possibly featuring clandestine underground facilities that exist amongst a larger dumb network within the Antelopee Valley. After all, AFRL popped up on many radars after Soul 2024 when Dr. Eric Davis stated AFRL was where he observed much of the concrete proof of the existence of UFO Legacy Program operations and mentioned this again during my interview with Davis. >> They finally got to be meet with Hal Putoff and and he briefed them with his set of information. A lot of what he has overlaps mine, but I have a lot of unique information both in and outside of the era of the 15 years that I worked with Hal. A lot of it came from NIDS. And Hal knew some of that. A lot of it came from AFRL and then a lot of it came uh through the OAP with my interactions with uh the CIA and other agencies and companies and so forth. >> I'm willing to bet that I look at Davis's comments on AFRL here through a bit of a different lens. I believe with confidence bolstered by several firstirhand private witness testimonies and a plethora of publicly available testimonies that the US Air Force and UFO legacy programs at large have achieved success both with the derivation of non-human aerospace technologies as well as creating alien reproduction vehicles that may very well closely emulate nonhuman craft in both appearance and capabilities. I have stated before and will state again that I believe Eric Davis lied to my face as well as the entire soul conference by stating there has never been any success in adapting non-human technologies for human use nor have there ever been any successful construction of alien reproduction vehicles. Uh and that's one of the interesting aspects with the maternal science aspect is uh people have talked about the story of uh alien reproduction vehicles ARVs and there are none there've never have been because we haven't been able to figure out their technology. The physics engineering and the uh manufacturing technology uh doesn't exist at this time. we're just barely scratching uh quantum materials now and how to uh create programmable quantum materials and uh but that was that was something that came out of this whole thing with respect to some of these aerospace companies that I interface with and that is is that they made some very interesting discoveries in the advanced materials material science uh aspect of the of the uh hardware that was recovered but propulsion and power no >> I vehemently disagree with Eric Davis this year and believe these comments are a form of program protection. Indeed, I then find it quite comical that after making these statements, Davis would appear in the age of disclosure sitting next to Hal Putoff who would make statements regarding reverse engineered vehicles. Again, I believe this is active program protection from Davis. And it stands to reason if most of Davis's concrete information regarding the UFO quote unquote crash retrieval portfolio originated from the AFRL that this program protection strategy from Davis may have been mandated by AFRL. So let's talk a little bit more here about AFRL because like AFMC and Wright Patterson AFRL is baked into UFO lore. I recognized that there were people in government that wanted to engage the public on topics that unfortunately had a stigma even though they were based in scientific fact. At the time, there was no mechanism for them to do this. Through a series of meetings, I was soon connected to a large group of US government officials from the CIA, the Department of Defense, and Loheed Martin Skunk Works. These guys were the ones involved in the secret of US government programs that dealt with these subjects. And they have all taken tremendous risks to themselves and their reputations to do something that can benefit the world. They wanted to be a part of something special, to be a part of a company that could not only change the way we see ourselves, but also change the path humanity is on. I am particularly intrigued with Tom Dong's Tooth the Stars Academy. TTSA has been a focal point of my videos, so I don't really want to spend too much time here. But as I have talked about recently, I believe Tom was targeted with an operation by Luis Alzando and others within the National Security Council to push for a limited disclosure. Again, I believe this limited disclosure push was modeled after the Bigalow Aerospace Advanced Space Studies 10-month report while contracting under the OSAP program called Project Forum. Not to beat a dead horse, but I believe this NSE program was undertaken by Luis Alzando, who even performed authorized disclosures of the immaculate constellation USA to Tom Dong in 2017. And if you think that's interesting, go watch my NRO project to learn more. Amongst Alzando, Chris Melon, numerous skunk works personnel, and possibly agency personnel. Tom was also advised by numerous highlevel military personnel. These included Air Force Major General Neil McCassland, who from 2011 to 2013 served as commander for the Air Force Research Lab out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base. Oh, and by the way, before his station as commander of AFL, McCastlin also served for three years as material wing director for AFL Space Vehicles Directorate, operated as vice commander for the Ogden Air Logistics Center under AFMC out of Hill Air Force Base out of the UTR or Utah test and training range, and performed much work closely with the National Reconnaissance Office. According to a communication between Tom Dong of TTSA and Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, McCastland would publicly position himself as a quote unquote skeptic regarding the UFO phenomenon, but behind closed doors was much more open. Quoting Dong's communication to Podesta regarding Macastland, quote, "Trust me, the advice has already been happening on how to do all this. He just has to say that out loud, but he is very, very aware as he was in charge of all the stuff. When Roswell crashed, they shipped it to the laboratory at Wright Patterson Air Force Base. General McCassland was in charge of that exact laboratory up to a couple years ago. End quote. Intriguing how allegedly, according to Dong, McCastlin stated that since the 1947 Roswell incident, critical Air Force Lab elements out of Wright Patterson had been engaging in the storage, study, and presumably reverse engineering of non-human vehicles. As I always say, TTSA is such a bizarre enigma, and perhaps one day I will sit down for a full investigation. It is interesting that recently TTSA always seems to sneak its way into my videos, isn't it? So, Macland allegedly stated Air Force Elements at Wright Patterson Air Force Base had been in charge of at least some recovered UFO materials, specifically Roswell since 1947. Well, of course, AFRL did not exist then. AFRL was formed in 1997. And the AFMC didn't exist then either. AFMC was established in 1992 as the amalgamation of the former Air Force Logistics Command, AFLC, and the former Air Force Systems Command, AFSC. So, in my opinion, this is where things start to get very, very interesting. For our investigation, I actually find a tremendous amount of value in studying the history of Air Force Material Command, its precursor MAGCOMs, and these inactive MAGCOM's connections with UFO crash retrievalss and reverse engineering. I believe by performing such an analysis of institutions that comprise the modern-day AFMC that have deep and shocking connections to UFO legacy program operations allows us clear insights into AFMC's role into the programs today and greatly strengthens the arguments and explorations we've made so far today towards AFMC. Recall in my Sandia project how I discussed the evolution of Ditra, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, and how after numerous iterations, the Ditra evolved from the Armed Forces Special Weapons Project, which originated from Los Alamos C division at Sandia Base. Well, AFMC's evolution and precursor agencies are far more shocking and even more consequential. As I stated, Air Force Material was created in 1992 from the joining of Air Force Logistics Command, AFLC, and Air Force Systems Command, AFSC. Let's start here with the Air Force Logistics Command. Air Force Logistics Command operated from 1961 to 1992 before it joined AFSC to form the AFMC. The mission of AFLC was to quote keep the US Air Force's aerospace weapon systems in a constant state of combat readiness and support of the Air Force's weapon systems in the form of procurement, supply, maintenance, and transportation. End quote. I am less interested in AFLC and more interested in what this MAGCOM was pre961. AFLC wasn't just created in 1961. It was the redesation of the Air Material Command or AMC. And guys, I know there's a lot here. Just know that Air Material Command is different from the modern-day Air Force Material Command. Air Material Command was established in 1946 and briefly served as the Air Force's R&D workhorse, managing all research and development, systems acquisition, supply, procurement, and maintenance functions for the fledgling Air Force. In 1951, research and development functions were transferred to the newly created Air Research and Development Command, ARDC, which we will talk about soon. But if Maclin's words to Tom Dong are true, seen as AMC operated out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base, it is not only a safe bet, but highly likely Air Material Command was the unit at Wright Patterson given custody of the Roswell wreckage. I personally believe the now defunct Air Material Command was integral alongside the US Army Corps of Engineers in constructing early deep underground military bases holding clandestine operations and UFO legacy programs across the continental United States. Indeed, I do not think it a stretch to assume AMC laid the groundwork for the connected network of dums I strongly believe exists below the Antelopee Valley, Edwards Air Force Base, China Lake, Nevada Test and Training Range, Dougway Proving Ground, and other critical sites. But of course, why do I think this? And if you've seen my video on dums, you may recall my section on subterranean facilities and the Nazi connection. Here I discussed extremely advanced Nazi subterranean sites like the Ordruff Rean worm logger out of Poland and extensive underground sensitive weapon labs and manufacturing plants operated under Nazi secret weapons project director Hans Comler. In the project I discussed operation paperclip the infamous program postworld war II to recruit Nazi scientists, engineers and technicians into US government employment. Two declassified documents can be discovered dating back to 1947 regarding Operation Paperclip. Featured in the documents are requests for a quote unquote requirement of four German technicians to consult on a planned quote unquote underground plant program. One man named in these intriguing documents was Xavier Dorsch, the director of the Tot organization in the closing days of World War II. The tot organization was the Nazis equivalent to the Navy CBS or US Army Corps of Engineers but not part of the formal German military structure. The founder of the organization Fritz Tot designed the famous German autobon highway system towards the end of World War II. While in the employment of the Nazis, Dorsch had helped with developing a series of huge underground industrial manufacturing facilities to hide from Allied bombing raids. It is quite possible he also aided on the Regan Worm Logger and Ordra, two extremely advanced Nazi underground locations. These requests for Nazi assistance on this underground plant program for Operation Paperclip. Well, of course, and maybe bizarrely, this was done by Air Material Command before the looming threat of the Cold War and need to hide facilities, capabilities, and sensitive installation underground to hide from the Soviets. What exactly was Air Material Command hoping to achieve with this underground plant program? And why did AMC specifically request Dorsch from the Tat organization who had extensive expertise in hyper advanced subterranean facility design and construction? Well, in my opinion, AMC partially wished for this underground plant program to appropriate infrastructure to safely hold recovered UFOs and provide appropriate laboratories and facilities for the study of these craft and their occupants. Seeing as many rumors have swirled, Hans Comler himself engaged with proton-azi legacy programs which studied recovered non-human technologies. I think it's probably a safe bet Hans Comler ended up with Savior Dorsch on this underground plant program out of ANC. Okay, now on to Air Force Systems Command, AFSC, the other half of today's AFMC. Air Force Systems Command was already named as an integral piece to UFO legacy program structure. Recall the testimony of former New Mexico State Rep. J. Andrew Kner, I have brought up several times throughout this video. Again, if you want to learn much more about Knisser's disclosures, I do recommend watching my Sandia project. But Kner learned that flying non-human discs recovered in New Mexico were given to the Atomic Energy Commission in its national laboratories under directive of classified presidential executive order in July of 1948. The resulting programs feature the National Security Council as overall program coordinator to study and reverse engineer these recovered craft and the Naval Research Lab, Research and Development Board and Air Force Systems Command served as critical support elements to early legacy programs. Air Force Systems Command was established in 1961 with the expressed mission of research and development for new weapon systems. Similar to Air Force Logistics Command, 1961 saw Air Force Systems Command as the newest rebranding of a major command. This being the Air Research and Development Command established in 1950/ 1951 to take R&D focus as well as Edwards Air Force Base out from under Air Material Command. So essentially even before Air Force Logistics Command and Air Force Systems Command joined to create AFMC in 1992, these two matchcoms already had quite a bit of interaction and swapping of components with each other. And again, similar to studying Air Force Logistics Commands roots as Air Material Command, I think there is tremendous value in studying Air Force Systems Command's roots as the Air Research and Development Center. Though it took R&D responsibility from Air Material Command in 1950/952, the Air Research and Development Command got its real shot in the arm on 1 April 1952 when the Air R&D Command gained a new subordinate, a former major command by the name of the Air Force Special Weapons Center, AFSWC. The Air Force Special Weapons Center operated from 1949 before it was disestablished in 1976 both as a major command and as a subordinate of Air Research and Development Command and as a subordinate of the Air Force Systems Command. The Air Force Special Weapons Center Command operated out of Kirtland Air Force Base and specialized in atomic, nuclear, and other unconventional weaponry. Once again, I encourage viewers to recall the 1954 atomic energy agreement gave rise to creative classifications to offiscate UFO programs, materials, biologics, R&D, etc. under transclassified foreign nuclear information, foreign intelligence information, specifically modern-day non-contract FII, and special nuclear materials. Essentially, creative classifications under the DOE and its precursor agencies. They're basically treating this as nuclear secrets because it gives off, you know, nuclear radiation because if you look at the ultra vague definition of special nuclear material, which is section 51, the Atomic Energy Act 1954, it says anything that gives off a sizable amount of atomic energy. Literally, that's what it says. Well, what's sizable? And what legal gymnastics are you saying this stuff, which is obviously not a well, who knows? Maybe it is a nuclear weapon. And you're saying this is a US nuclear secret. You're transclassifying it into a nuclear secret, which I understand maybe at first why they did that. And I'm not admonishing the hard decisions that presidents and other folks did many years ago when this was more of an enigma and we wanted to like lock it down, figure it out, and then see what we're going to do. When the Air Force Special Weapons Center was disestablished in 1976 when operating under Air Force Systems Command, the AFSWC OPR or Office of Primary Responsibility came to the Air Force Weapons Lab or AWFL. Then in 1992, AFWL merged into AFRL. And I know this is complicated, but this means the Air Force Special Weapons Center is part of the modern-day Air Force Material Command through two channels. Both the modern-day primary R&D lab of the Air Force AFR, and the Air Force Systems Command, which would form the modern-day AFMC. And look, I get it. This is very complicated. So, that is why I'm creating this chart on screen now to highlight all of these critical former match comps and components that make up the modern-day AFMC that I wager are critical components to UFO legacy programs. But why do I talk about this Air Force special weapons center? Well, this to me is one of the most interesting parts of this entire video. There is one figure associated with early 1950s Air Force UFO retrievals that is more enigmatic and curious than almost anyone else I have ever covered. Tell me if you've heard this name before. Eric Henry Wang. And until now, I have found next to nothing actionable on Wang, let alone a photograph of this mysterious man. But after finding some breakthroughs in Kirtland Air Force Base's 1956 yearbook, we can finally find some answers on Wangs that help puts together decades of puzzle pieces. Eric Henry Wang has been infamously named in two UFO crash retrieval cases I consider very likely real. The 1953 Kingman, Arizona UFO crash retrieval and the 1948 Aztec, New Mexico UFO crash retrieval. One of my earliest videos actually focused on the Kingman crash, a retrieval case that had captured my imagination for years. And as we discussed with Christopher Melon signal exchange, apparently he and unknown parties came to the conclusion this case is real as well. And the SCS2 gatekeeper to Air Force programs, possibly Russell Wiler, may have been protecting the history of this crash retrieval. In the Kingman case, Wang was listed as leading a reverse engineering team. These accusations were levied by primary witness Arthur Stansel Jr. who first disclosed his firsthand encounter with the retrieval operation under the pseudonym Fritz Warner. Stansel, a World War II army veteran and an accomplished engineer, worked out of then right field on many historically significant programs, including the Manhattan project. One such mission Stansel was involved in was 1953's Operation Upshot Knole. This project isn't on Kingman, so I will skip over many of the crucial details, but Stansel claimed he was taken to the crash site to analyze wreckage ballistics. And again, Stansel listed Wang as a senior reverse engineering team lead. Well, indeed, shockingly, Arthur Stansel did in fact work directly under Eric H. Wang on Operation Upshot Knole nuclear tests. Here we can find Wang operated as the technical and scientific monitor for the Air Force program. Wang's official duties here in 1953 was chief for the special studies office out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base out of the air research and development matchcom, the precursor to air force systems command. outside of some old civil engineering DTICK documents and air force material command documents regarding the Cold War discussing Wang as a critical DoD engineer out of Reich Patterson and Kirtland Air Force Base. I found very little regarding Wang. Regardless of Wang being named by Stansel, a very credible witness to the Kingman crash, as well as Wang being named as a chief under the air research and development command working out of Kirtland and Wright Patterson, two air force bases and a former MAGCOM. we have discussed extensively in regard to Air Force legacy programs. Wang was still a dead end and there was no imagery to put a face to the name. Fast forward to when I tackled the 1948 Aztec New Mexico crash retrieval. I found a convoluted case where in my opinion a real crash retrieval event was buried under layers of epic drama, disinformation, bad actors, and smearing of witnesses. The biggest contributor to this case, in my opinion, is the legendary UFO researcher and personal hero of mine, William Steinman. I could rant and rave about Steinman all day long, but his incredibly valuable and incredibly rare 1986 book, UFO Crash at Aztec, a well-kept secret, is the definitive Aztec investigation. Steinman even went through old Denver court records to argue why Silas Newton and Leo Gabau were not the simple conmen history has painted them as. In his pursuit of the truth of Aztec, Steinman once again came across Wang. And according to Steinman, quote, "When one mentions the name of Dr. Eric Henry Wang to anyone who knew about his work, especially the intelligence department personnel, no matter what their rank and responsibility, they shudder and ask you to leave them alone." When one starts investigations into his life and background, the various branches of the intelligence group start buzzing with activity. The work that Dr. Wang was involved in was so highly classified that there were no more levels of secretly left above that. He was involved and in charge of some of the most secret segments pertaining to the ultimate secrets, the flying saucer program. End quote. Similar to my conclusions, Steinman found it exceedingly difficult to find mentions of Wang in the public domain. Steinman was able to wrangle up tiny references to Wang, his obituary, in fact, in the April 1961 edition of Mechanical Engineering magazine. The orbituary Steinman uncovered shed more light on this enigmatic figure possibly connected to Aztec and Kingman. Wang was born in Austria on 6th May 1906 and after earning his degree in teaching in Cincinnati, Ohio, Wang served from 1949 to 1956 as head of the department of special studies at Wright Air Development Center. In 1956, Wang's department was moved to Sandia Laboratory Complex at Kirtland Air Force Base, where he remained until his death in 1960, sadly at the age of 54. Admirably, Steinman contacted an individual in Albuquerque who knew Wang very well. This individual was mentioned only by the name MW. MW stated Wang's personal papers were all confiscated by military intelligence upon his death. Placed behind lock and key of a highly secret section of the library at Kirtland Air Force Base. Indeed, MW told Steman one Dr. H A K is quote deeply involved in the flying saucer program. In fact, he was completely in charge of it at the time Dr. Wang was still alive and involved in it end quote. These initials, HAK, while these could possibly be one Henry Kissinger, former national security adviser and US Secretary of State. Wishing to discuss saucers off a likely tampered with line, Steinman and MW plan to exchange letters. Steinman never heard back from MW, however, but did notice his mail being tampered with and a tracking device stuck to his van. But after what feels like a lifetime, I finally found this obituary and learned more about Wang's role. Oh, and yeah, from this obituary, we can find out that MW Steinman spoke to. Well, that was Maria Wang, Eric Wang's wife. So Wang's wife not only confirmed he was involved in the quote unquote flying saucer program, that his boss and head of the program while Wang was active was quite possibly Henry Kissinger. And more from that obituary. Wang's position within Wright Patterson Air Force Base that was moved to Kirtland in 1956 was in the research directorate of the Air Force Special Weapons Center. the former MAGCOM that ultimately formed the skeleton of Air Force Systems Command and the AFLRL, both of which today comprised the skeleton of Air Force Material Command. So, Dr. Eric Henry Wang, an individual named as early as the 1970s by Stansel as being a critical UFO legacy program scientist, literally served within the highest echelons of the Air Force Special Weapons Center that would become the AFMC of today. Talk about an incredible connection. And that's when I found it. a 1956 Kirtland Air Force base yearbook focused on the Air Force Special Weapons Center. Within the research directorates, there he is an image of a man I am sure everybody here has seen for the first time. A man deeply connected with UFO legacy programs. Eric Henry Wang. So in this section, we have studied Air Force MCCOMs under the headquarters of the Air Force. Of the 10 matchcoms in existence, four caught our eye. And of these four, only one AFMC attracted our attention for an entire investigation. In summary, the lineage of Air Force Material Command, the highest budgeted MAGCOM tasked with acquisition and RDT for the Air Force, is chalk full of other institutions, individuals, and claims surrounding UFO legacy programs. These largely included the Air Force Systems Command, Air Force Logistics Command, Air Material Command, Air Research and Development Command, the Air Force Special Weapons Center, and Eric Henry Wang. What's going on everybody? It's Gerb. And if you made it with me this far, I'd like to thank you so much for joining me. And I truly hope you learned something today, because I sure did while making this project. Before I get into my end of video rant, a couple things here. You'll notice behind me a new backdrop. I moved house during the making of this video, which is one of the many reasons why this project in particular took so long. I'm sure you can guess the other reasons why this project took me so darn long to make. But, you know, with that being said, let's just jump in and uh start talking about my end of video rant and kind of recap some of my thoughts on the project. Now, would you believe me if I told you that I didn't even get everything I wanted to put into this project into the project? For example, a key missing part here is NASC, the National Air and Space Intelligence Center out of Wright Patterson Air Force Base, which I both believe and have exposure to having involvement in UFO legacy programs for the Air Force and for joint programs. This was something because our project was already 3 and 1/2 hours or so, I just did not have the ability to put into the project. So, you know, maybe another time we'll add on a chapter, make a super cut, or I'll make a full video on NASA and other Air Force stuff. You know, as we pulled on these threads today and as we reach the conclusion of the project, I think the primary thesis and primary outlook and and thing I hope people look at moving forward from this project is what I like to call and what others have referred to to me as the hidden wing. This is a test and evaluation program of derivative vehicles ranging from derivative vehicles to alien reproduction vehicles and non-human intelligence craft that humans have found a way to interface with. And this project, this flight test program in this TN program sees pilots pulled from the USNTPS, US Navy test pilot school up at PAX River and of course the AFTC Air Force Test Center TPS out at Edwards Air Force Base. This project is conducted across the western ranges. The western ranges include, but are not limited to, the Utah test and training range, the Nevada test and training range, and the airspace around the Edwards 412 test wing. Now, an interesting thing before I continue with the hidden wing exploration here is recall back to the testimony of Sergeant Rodrik Castle, who in 1997 as a Marine, as an AV8B aviation ordinance technician for I'm sorry, as an AV8B Harrier Jet AC ordinance technician, uh, Castle was participating in the 1997 Hunter Warrior Fighting Experiments kind of near a little bit northwest of 29 Palms Marine Corps Station. uh when responding to some unidentified flare activity, he and his fellow Marines encountered an enormous black triangle hovering silentless silently and a ground element team. Well, the direction in which that triangle departed was back towards Edwards Air Force Base. Not just Edwards, but R2508, which is a restricted Edwards Air Force Base site. So, that's just another interesting parallel to this thesis today to the Hidden Wing. So, as I kind of discussed, Hidden Wing features ARV, derivative tech, and non-human intelligence vehicles. It is run out of Western Ranges. Um, this is overseen by, of course, elements of the Edwards 412 test wing, but the real administrators here to this project I've outlined are AFTTE, test and evaluation, as well as, of course, the AFTC, which as we know extends to AFMC and AFRL and that whole MAGCOM. But if we're if we're looking at the real top of the chain of command for this specific T& program, uh for actual hands-on T&, this would be AFTTE. And I would be really interested to see different individuals who have spearheaded aft, an individual by the last name Clark, and how they might have set up the infrastructure for this program. Under TE, we looked at TE, we looked at Tees, special programs, and specifically I wager that I have had exposure and understanding to tee involvement. So the hidden wing we also looked at of course SAF AQ SAFA a huge emphasis on SAF AQ as we kind of a bridge from the NRO program whose NRO acquisition programs are are joint ran by the DDNI ATNF deputy director for national intelligence acquisition technology and facilities and USDAs under secretary for defense for acquisition and sustainment. U from what I understand and from what I have learned, acquisition is a major part in UFO legacy programs in various intelligence and armed forces divisions of the United States. Uh specifically specifically we looked at AQL uh special programs, AQX acquisition integration and AQR science, technology and engineering. All three of these, not only do I suspect have had involvement in legacy programs, but some of the testimony I have gathered over my research and individuals I've talked to have directly named these elements, specifically AQX. So, SAF AQ was of course extremely interesting and we looked at the assistant secretary of the Air Force for acquisition technology and facilities or maybe logistics. Get my wires crossed there right now. But we looked at individuals like Susi Payton, Lawrence J. Delaney and of the 14 ASAC FATNFs, we derived that eight of 14, over half of individuals who have served as the ASAC FATNF have some combination of something like SIC, Loheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, General Dynamics, LTV Aerospace in their bio, pregovernment service. Isn't that interesting? You know, we also looked at SAFA, which is of course the administrative assistant secretary to the Air Force. We looked at SAF A a special programs and Russell Eeiler and SAF Az uh info protection SPL/ special program oversight um etc. And we looked at Russell William E. Mccclure there. I'm I'm sorry. So many names. I just wrapped up the project. There's so much floating around in my brain. So if I'm tripping up my words, I'm I'm sorry there guys. Promise I'm not trying to. And we connected Mccclure or Russell E. Wiler to the possible SCS2 gatekeeper that Christopher Melon outlined when he posted some redacted signal exchanges. And this redacted signal exchange was in response to actually Sean Kirk Pat likely in response to Sean Kirkpatrick um screenshotting and sending some of his foyer some of his signal exchanges with Christopher Melon to be included in a foyer drop to John Greenwald. And I think that was about summer 2024. And this was in relation to David Grush clearly not trusting Arrow and not talking to Arrow and Sean Kirkpatrick throwing a fissy hissy fit about that. So I found that interesting. And of of course in that signal exchange that SCS2 gatekeepers named I have to thank Alex Katz for his excellent work. I'm at a crossroads here. I probably lean 6040 Russell Wiler versus William E. Mccclure. I slightly think this more think this is Russell Wiler. And of course again I have to commend Alex. But I firmly believe one of these two men is that SCS gatekeeper Melon was referring to. But both of these men have involvement in history in legacy programs. Outside of SAFQ, we talked about the RCO, the rapid capabilities office. And we of course took a look at some footage of Randall Walden, director of RCO and and program executive officer. And senior executive service, remember senior executive service is the civilian equivalent to a flag officer or general officer. So like a twostar SCES would be a twostar general. But the RCO as far as I understand the RCO is the perfect mechanism for UFO legacy programs clandestine RDT&E test and evaluation out at the Hidden Wing out at Edwards Air Force Base in the Western Ranges to bypass traditional bureaucratic red tape and kind of pull funding from anywhere that's needed. Of course, if friends of the folks of the channel, regular viewers will know my friend Kermit, know that Kermit is big and a professional in the finance world. I'm sure he would love to get his teeth on um kind of what we talked about today from the testimony of Ed that 30 to 40% of various budgets get slashed by elements of AQ before reaching SAF FM or financial management. I found that incredibly intriguing. What else did we cover? And of of course the big elephant in the room probably is of course AFOSIPJ or Office of Special Projects. Uh we discussed PJ Executive Director Terry Phillips who also served as Air Force Special Access Program Security Director before he moved on to Lados and then Northrup Grumman. When we talk about gatekeepers, at least in the public realm, I see so much focus on folks like Glenn Gaffne uh now James Clapper. Thankfully, thank you, David Crush, for that absolutely courageous act to name Clapper since folks in Age of Disclosure would not name him um and have likely received top cover from him before for National Security Council run things. So, thank you, Mr. Gush, for ousting Clapper and Stephanie O'Sullivan. But the gatekeeper conversation kind of resol revolves around Gaffne uh Sullivan Clapper uh Doug Wolf, former CIA DS&T deputy director, former ADNI ATNF and kind of founder of the CIA's Office of Global Access. them. I've tried to introduce some other names into that that are starting to get some traction thankfully, including Mary Sturivant, who was a longtime CIA spook and um also served within the NRO and various VP positions at Locking Martin, including vice president for government affairs from 2006 to 2021. Uh Christopher Melon asked this woman again, stop protecting her. I'm sure she remembers this time. But there are other names and gatekeepers I want to enter into that conversation at such a high level. These include William E. Mccclure, Randall G. Walden. Um, these include Russell E. Wiler. These include folks like Donna Shipton as well. And the biggest of that group, the biggest of this project is Terry Phillips. You know, there was some tweets about Eric Berles watching my recent interview with Jesse Michael. So, I have to say, Representative Berles, if you are watching this, an individual like Terry Phillips needs to be hit with a subpoena or interrogatories. And please don't take the Luna route and announce publicly that you're going to subpoena somebody like she did to Kirk Patrick back at the hearings on 9 September 2025. But with that being said, I this was such a robust project and we've talked about AQ, we've talked about RCO, we've talked about SAF, AAA, you know, including AAH, AAZ, we've talked about AFOSIPJ and their cadre of FBI elements. What haven't we touched on in our end of video rant? Well, of course, that would be major commands. There are 10 major commands in existence. We looked at four and we narrowed down one to look at for the majority of this video. That being Air Force Material Command. Why Material Command? Well, as we showed, and I didn't even get into connections with Roswell and the former Air Material Command, Air Force Material Command is the deepest rooted MAGCOM in prior UFO Legacy Program discussion, dating back to figures like Eric Henry Wang with the AFSWC that of course the Air Force Special Weapons Center with within which Wang operated in their research and development directorate, specifically the research directorate um from Wright Patterson Air Force Base to moving to Kirtland Air Force Base in which he remained until his death. Um that AFSWC served as a subordinate transferred from a major command to a subordinate to the Air Research and Developments Command ARDC onto Air Force Systems Command AFSC. And of course, AFSC and Air Force Logistics Command merged in 1992 to form Air Force Material Command. Not only that, but when the AFSWC was dissolved as a subordinate to the AFSC in 1976, the OPR or Office of Primary Responsibility of AFS a of AFSWC transferred to the Air Force Research Lab. Air Force Research Lab of course intertwined in this project throughout all we did because of course AF AFLRL contains a major presence at at many of the United States testing ranges and and air bases and these include Edwards Air Force Base, Kirtland Air Force Base and of course Wright Patterson Air Force Base. So again, as I talked with NASC at the beginning, there was so much we couldn't even fit into this project and I this to me is the start of analysis of of Air Force program. So again, I would like to reference back to my UFO legacy program pyramid. The United States Air Force, in my opinion, is a DoD/IC admin. One of the second layers of this pyramid, but it's not that simple. With layers hidden within layers, it's not just the amorphous or nebulous they as an air force that operates within the programs. I am extremely confident in my assertions and my hypothesis here. extremely about as confident as one could possibly be. And I'm not telling you to believe it. I am saying that I present this research for you as a viewer to follow up on and and form your own thoughts and conduct follow-up research. But I personally have the utmost conviction here in what I put out. I stand by what I've said today and I will back it up. And you know, if if if you were to if you were to press me about these details, I would stand by them no matter what. I I'm extremely confident in my thesis today. But again, the DoDIC admin layer of my pyramid and the Air Force's involvement in in that, it's not just the Secretary of the Air Force, the Department of the Air Force, but it is stuff like SAF AQ and specific elements within SAF AQ and the RCO and AFTTE and AFTZ, all of this stuff filtering down to their work on their major and their in with their major commands, their MRTFBs and so forth and subordinate wings and numbered air forces. I I hope that sort of top- down view as we trickle down was was pretty apparent today. I know I said that if you learned one thing from the video, I'd like it to be my hidden wing thesis about the test and evaluation program out at the Western Ranges. You know, I I'll I'll I'll expand on that statement. I hope you learned three things today. That the hidden wing, the name Terry Phillips, and of course, the sort of compartmentalization or directorates within the Air Force. I mean, I'm willing to bet a lot of individuals who watch this video, you know, weren't aware of the specific special programs, attachments, and so forth in the Air Force that are kind of rerled under specific compartments within the air staff or within compliance or within the SAF AA. I find it absolutely intriguing. Again, I think that what I outlined here today is going to age very strongly in the future as as I'll be an optimist here as we get some forms of disclosure. And in fact, I wouldn't be surprised if this hidden wing if there were attempts to reveal this hidden wing to the world in years past. Not too far from years past either. But let me know what you guys have to say below. I I really hope this could spark some strong discussion. And um you know I some I'd like to see some other trailblazers like Alex Catz start to look into AQL, AQX, AQR into TE, TEP, TEZ, AFOS, IIPJ, uh you know, all the elements of AQ, AH, A C's has already done a a because he's awesome. But I'd like to see a lot of discussion get sparked based upon this project. I really hope we see some kind of fruitful discussions. Um, you know, still to this day I'll I'll see kind of large scale podcasts, you know, whether it be Joe Rogan, whether it be other podcasts where individuals who aren't necessarily hardcore on the topic, but have an interest in the topic are talking about UFO legacy programs. And I still see the question thrown around, how could the nebulous they US government keep such a thing secret? with compartments like AQL, with compartments like SAF A with compartments like AFOSIPJ who are legally obliged to kill insider and outsider threats to programs if it's deemed a severe enough national security risk risk. So I hope stuff like that kind of answers these questions or or can help people address such questions in in the public realm. I I know this project was super different than anything I've ever done. You know, I've made UFFL legacy program analysis on the NRO and the Navy and Northrup Grumman and and SIC and so forth. Those are primarily addressings of claims and so forth. And while I stand by those projects as well, I I wanted to kind of trailblaze here and take a different route to what I've done before. I I could have spent the whole project talking about Fouche, talking about blue book stuff, but I really wanted to craft the Air Force legacy program structure as I understand it. And again, I think that my framework of the legacy program structure is is pretty accurate and I think over time it's going to age pretty well. But I want to know what you guys think. You know, I I don't have all the answers here. This is just something that I have had some pretty interesting exposure to. And of course, this project has taken me years to be able to have the confidence to put out this thesis. So, ever since I started to kind of pull on the threads of legacy programs, it has been a goal of mine, a desire of mine to address the Air Force, but in such a specific and appropriate way. Again, let me know what you guys think below. And as I wrap up the section, um, please remember to like and subscribe. That really helps out the channel, and I I thank each and every one of you for being here. I do have a Patreon. I I don't gatekeep content, so only support what you think the channel is worth. I'll probably open up channel memberships as well, you know, besides some, I guess, custom emojis and my logo and stuff that I I don't gatekeep content. So, there as well, just support what you think the channel is worth. And if you're just watching the video, like and subscribing. I I thank you from the bottom of my heart. I thank everybody for being here. Of course, I got some awesome stuff on the way. I can't wait to share. Um, if you're watching this video before the 31st of January, please keep my guy Alexander Vulcanowski in your thoughts if you're watching some UFC. Um, anybody who's watched the channel long enough knows he is my favorite athlete of all time and I'm way too emotionally invested in his fight. So, um, hopefully I don't have a bad day on on Saturday. With that being said, guys, thanks again for being here and I will catch everybody next time. And again, let me know your thoughts. Thank you so much. Bye.